RAJ BUILDER

Overview of RAJ BUILDER

RAJ BUILDER operates in the Indian real estate market, primarily in Madhya Pradesh, with a mixed record in dealing with legal disputes. With a total of 20 complaints lodged against them, they have successfully won only 5 cases while losing 15. This blog post delves into the details surrounding RAJ BUILDER's performance in legal matters, extracting patterns from their cases to help potential buyers make informed decisions.

Legal Case Analysis

Patterns in Cases Lost

Among the 15 cases lost by RAJ BUILDER, a few themes are evident:

• Failure to Deliver on Contract Terms: Many cases hinged on claims related to the builder not constructing properties as promised. Customers reported that despite significant payments, the flats were not built or delivered. This was a common thread in their complaints.
• Contractual Compliance Issues: In instances where the builder lost, it appears that the issues often revolved around RAJ …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Raj Builder, which it lost, revealed significant insights into the builder's operational practices and the common themes that emerged in these disputes.

The cases can be broadly categorized into four types: Delayed Possession Claims, Failure to Construct as per Agreement, Disputes over Payment Compliance, and Compensation for Mental Distress and Delay.

Delayed Possession Claims encompass a substantial number of cases where buyers claimed that flats were not constructed or possession was not granted despite full payment and a prolonged waiting period—often 5 years or more.

Failure to Construct as per Agreement cases highlighted instances where buyers alleged that the builder did not adhere to the agreed-upon specifications or timelines for construction. This theme often overlapped with delayed possession claims, as buyers frequently sought compensation for both the delay and the failure to deliver properties as promised.

…

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

The analysis of the cases filed by RAJ BUILDER, in which it lost, reveals troubling themes surrounding the builder's disputes with customers.

One primary area of concern appears in the theme of Refund and Payment Disputes, where the builder contested claims that clients were owed refunds after booking flats. In this case, a non-applicant booked a flat, paid the amount, but was left without the promised refund despite repeated requests. This raises questions about the builder's commitment to financial compliance and customer satisfaction.

Another theme detected is Customer Consent and Agreement Validity, highlighting the nature of the contracts signed. The respondent in the case insisted they signed the agreement with full awareness and without undue pressure, which suggests that the builder may have difficulty in proving that clients were dissatisfied or coerced during the agreement process.

Common triggers leading RAJ BUILDER to litigation seem to stem from customer dissatisfaction with …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, RAJ BUILDER, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily revolved around two key themes: Case Cancellations Due to Mutual Consent and Disputes Over Consideration Payments.

In terms of case cancellations, several claims demonstrated instances where both parties reached a consensus, leading to the cancellation of cases. This indicates an informal agreement process whereby issues were resolved outside of a traditional courtroom setting. On the other hand, disputes over consideration payments highlighted contentions where RAJ BUILDER had to defend its position regarding payment claims made by buyers who contested full payment or construction delays.

The builder commonly brought these cases to court to contest claims regarding unpaid considerations, and to clear disputes when buyers alleged non-compliance with agreements. A recurring pattern in these instances suggests that misunderstandings regarding payment schedules or project timelines often triggered the builder's litigation. Moreover, …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, RAJ BUILDER, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The disputes highlighted in these cases primarily revolve around two main themes: sewage line disputes and issues of compensation related to non-compliance with contractual terms. The legal battles often arise from claims made by buyers and their grievances relating to the builder's obligations or the quality of service provided. In the first case, the applicant faced issues with sewage line connectivity, claiming that the builder was responsible for the oversight. However, the builder effectively defended itself by clarifying that they were not the promoters of the colony and that the resolution of such disputes fell under the purview of the Municipal Corporation. In the second case, the applicant sought compensation for a flat that was never constructed. The builder argued that the applicant had not adhered to the contract terms, which …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis