| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Understanding Rajasthan Affordable Housing Developers Association: A Critical Analysis
The Rajasthan Affordable Housing Developers Association (RAHDA) has made its mark in the real estate sector within Rajasthan, but potential buyers need to navigate this landscape with caution. This blog will explore the association's history of legal disputes, highlighting the implications for future buyers, and offering strategic tips for anyone considering a purchase.
Overview of Legal Cases
Rajasthan Affordable Housing Developers Association has faced legal challenges, with one significant complaint filed against them. In a notable legal case, the association lost, showcasing a concerning aspect of their track record:
- Number of Complaints: 1
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 1
In the sole case filed against RAHDA, a penalty was imposed for violating Section 11(2) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Specifically, the ruling resulted in a fine of Rs. 5,000 for each of the six respondent promoters involved. …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Rajasthan Affordable Housing Developers Association, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two primary topics: regulatory non-compliance and penalties for project delays.
The first theme, regulatory non-compliance, encompasses the builder's violations of statutory requirements outlined in the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA). In one notable case, the builder was penalized for breaching Section 11(2) of RERA, which highlights the importance of adhering to legal frameworks in real estate development.
The second theme, penalties for project delays, is closely related to the first since many of the delays may stem from or be exacerbated by regulatory non-compliance. Delays often trigger penalties, as evidenced by the imposition of fines on the builder's promoters. These penalties indicate a systemic issue where the builder may have underestimated compliance requirements or failed to allocate sufficient …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!