| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When it comes to purchasing property, the reputation and reliability of a builder is paramount. Today, we delve into the case of Rajdeep Builders, a developer based in Goa with a contentious legal history. With only one complaint to their name but a lost case on record, potential buyers should be informed about what this means for their investment.
Legal Case Overview
Rajdeep Builders has faced a legal challenge regarding their compliance with the Goa Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA). They were penalized for not registering their projects with the authority. The core of the issue revolved around claims made by the builder—stating they were not marketing or issuing advertisements for the projects—contradicted by the findings that warranted a penalty of ₹1,00,000 for violating RERA provisions.
Case Analysis
Cases Lost
There is only one case on record that Rajdeep Builders has lost. This case involved a breach …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Rajdeep Builders, which it lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight ongoing issues primarily related to the builder's compliance with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) and other regulatory frameworks.
The first type of case involves penalties for non-compliance with RERA provisions. In one notable case, Rajdeep Builders was fined ₹1,00,000 for failing to register their projects with the Goa RERA. The builder's defense—that they were not marketing or issuing advertisements for the projects—was insufficient to mitigate their obligation to register as required by law. This case underscores a pattern in which builders may misunderstand their responsibilities under RERA or attempt to circumvent its provisions, leading to legal consequences.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include the builder's failure to adhere to regulatory requirements and their inability to provide adequate evidence of compliance during legal proceedings. People …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!