No Logo Available

RAJDEEP & CO. INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED

4.8/5 (10 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Haryana
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction to Rajdeep & Co. Infra Private Limited

Rajdeep & Co. Infra Private Limited is a builder operating primarily in Haryana, with additional projects outside the specified regions. This blog post explores the legal complexities surrounding this builder, including patterns in complaints and case outcomes, providing potential buyers with insight into their legitimacy and reliability.

Overview of Legal Complaints and Outcomes

Rajdeep & Co. Infra Private Limited has encountered a total of 10 complaints, of which they successfully navigated through 8 cases won, and 2 cases lost. This statistic illuminates the builder's capacity to address legal challenges effectively while also indicating some areas of concern.

Breakdown of Legal Cases and Verdicts

Cases Filed and Won

The builder has submitted and won 7 cases, predominantly revolving around mutual settlements that were acknowledged and recorded by the applicable authorities. The common thread across these cases includes:

  • Mutual Settlement Agreement

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Settlement Disputes Payment Delays

Analysis of the cases filed against Rajdeep & Co. Infra Private Limited, which the builder lost, reveals several key points across the two instances.

The primary theme in these cases revolves around "Settlement Disputes." Both cases indicate that the builder reached a settlement agreement with the other parties involved. However, the specifics of the claims from both the complainant and the builder remain vague or are not disclosed. Nevertheless, the outcome shows that the builder ultimately fulfilled their part of the agreement, leading to the resolution of the matters.

Another theme that is crucial, yet subtly present, is "Payment Delays." While the cases do not explicitly state that payments were delayed, the verdicts mention "full and final payment in terms of the settlement," which suggests that prior to the settlement, there may have been disputes around payments or their timing. This is a common area of contention in …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Mutual Settlements Penalties for Project Delays Compliance and Adjournments

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Rajdeep & Co. Infra Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases largely fall into three main themes: Mutual Settlements, Penalties for Project Delays, and Compliance and Adjournments.

Firstly, the builder has frequently moved applications for placing mutual settlement agreements on file, indicating a focus on resolving disputes through negotiations rather than litigation. The ability to successfully incorporate these agreements into the court’s records demonstrates the builder's commitment to amicable solutions, which ultimately reflects positively on its business practices.

Secondly, some cases involved requests for adjournments to deal with penalties tied to project delays. While the specifics of the claims are not detailed, it showcases the builder’s proactive stance in managing obligations, also pointing to the possibility of delays being attributed to unforeseen circumstances, or perhaps misunderstandings surrounding project timelines.

Common triggers for the builder’s litigation appear to …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Full and Final Payment Disputes Project Completion Claims

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Rajdeep & Co. Infra Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The predominant themes in the legal disputes involved 'Full and Final Payment Disputes' and 'Project Completion Claims', indicating that most contentions arose over financial settlements and the timely delivery of projects.

In the case summaries provided, it is clear that the opposing parties, likely including buyers and investors, filed complaints primarily due to disagreements over the fulfillment of financial obligations, which often led to claims of penalties, disputes over project timelines, or claims related to quality and compliance with initial agreements. Patterns from these cases suggest that buyers may sometimes feel frustrated or misled, leading them to pursue legal action against builders.

The builder’s successes in court appear to stem from several factors. Many cases were disposed of after the opposing party received the full …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review