RAJDEEP & COMPANY INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED
- States Active In: Haryana, Himachal Pradesh
| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the dynamic world of real estate, choosing the right builder is a critical decision for homebuyers. One builder that has recently garnered attention is Rajdeep & Company Infra Private Limited. This blog post delves into Rajdeep & Company's legal history, highlighting the number of complaints filed against them, the outcomes of these cases, and essential tips for potential buyers.
Builder Overview
Rajdeep & Company Infra Private Limited has faced a total of 27 complaints in various forums. They have won 15 cases while losing 12, indicating a somewhat mixed record in the legal landscape of real estate.
States of Operation
The builder operates projects predominantly in Haryana and Himachal Pradesh, showcasing their regional presence in North India.
Legal Case Analysis
Cases Lost by the Builder
When analyzing the cases where Rajdeep & Company filed and lost, three patterns emerge:
- Amicable Settlements: In all three instances, …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Rajdeep & Company Infra Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their business practices and legal disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into several themes, highlighting the common grievances faced by the complainants.
The majority of the cases revolved around Delayed Possession Claims, where the complainants asserted that they had paid substantial amounts for flats in projects like 'Claridges Residency' yet faced prolonged delays in possession. The builder consistently attributed these delays to various reasons, including pending approvals, financial issues, and force majeure events. However, the authorities did not accept these defenses and ultimately directed the builder to refund the amounts paid, often accompanied by interest and penalties.
Refund Disputes emerged as another frequent theme. Complainants sought refunds due to the builder's failure to deliver possession on time or at all, and the builder's claims of delays due to …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Rajdeep & Company Infra Private Limited, which it lost, reveals some significant insights into the nature of disputes surrounding its operations. A recurring theme among these cases is the reliance on amicable settlements, suggesting that the builder often seeks resolution outside the courtroom. However, this trend also appears to coincide with cases that involve penalties, particularly related to financial obligations stemming from agreements made with other parties.
Various themes were identifiable within the disputes, with the most notable being 'Amicable Settlements' and 'Penalty Disputes'. The case summaries show that the builder frequently sought to overturn penalties by arguing mutual agreements were in place. The 'Issues with Pre-deposit Conditions' emerged as another common thread, where the builder appeared to contest requirements that they felt were unfair or misapplied.
The primary reasons for the builder's litigation appear to revolve around contesting penalties that …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolve around a few key themes, including Penalty Disputes where the builder contested the penalties imposed for various regulatory breaches, Regulatory Compliance involving claims related to the builder's adherence to legal standards, Settlement of Claims which reflect amicable resolutions, and Deposit and Payment Issues concerning the compliance with financial provisions outlined in the regulatory framework.
In the majority of cases, the builder asserted that penalties calculated by the Authority exceeded the prescribed limit under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, showcasing a consistent challenge against perceived excessive charges. Additionally, a pattern indicates that the builder often found itself in disputes regarding compliance with deposit-related regulations, as seen in multiple instances where the respondents claimed the builder had failed to make timely payments.
The common reasons for these legal actions …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Rajdeep & Company Infra Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information:
The cases primarily revolved around the theme of 'Authority's Power to Review' and 'Recalculation of Penalties.' In the focus case, the opposing party sought a review of the authority's order concerning penalty recalculation. However, the defense presented by the builder highlighted that the authority lacked the power to perform such a review, and that recalculation should not be interpreted as a rectification action but rather a review, which the authority is not permitted to execute under current statutes.
The underlying reasons for bringing these cases to court often stemmed from disputes over penalties and the assessment of orders made by regulatory authorities. In this instance, the issue was the applicant's dissatisfaction with the penalty imposed, leading to a request for a recalculated penalty.
The builder successfully defended …
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!