No Logo Available

RAJDEEP & COMPANY INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

3.8/5 (3 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Himachal Pradesh
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

An In-Depth Review of Rajdeep & Company Infrastructure Private Limited: Insights for Homebuyers

When it comes to investing in a residential property, choosing the right builder is crucial. In this article, we will take a closer look at Rajdeep & Company Infrastructure Private Limited, focusing on their track record, performance in legal cases, and what potential buyers should consider when dealing with this builder.

Overview of Rajdeep & Company Infrastructure Private Limited

Rajdeep & Company Infrastructure Private Limited operates primarily in Himachal Pradesh. With a limited footprint, the builder's projects are localized, which can be an advantage for homebuyers seeking community-focused developments.

Legal Record of Rajdeep & Company

Complaints and Legal Cases

Rajdeep & Company Infrastructure Private Limited has a total of 3 complaints filed against them, with a troubling record of 0 cases won and 3 cases lost. This raises significant concerns regarding their business practices and customer …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Misrepresentation and Refunds Failure to Provide Promised Services and Facilities

Analysis of the cases filed against Rajdeep & Company Infrastructure Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their business practices and the common themes that emerged from these disputes.

The cases can be broadly categorized into three topics: Delayed Possession Claims, Misrepresentation and Refunds, and Failure to Provide Promised Services and Facilities.

In the realm of Delayed Possession Claims, the Authority observed that the builder frequently attributed delays to circumstances beyond their control. However, the verdicts indicated that buyers were particularly concerned about the timely completion of amenities which are crucial for home occupancy, such as functional elevators and operational sewage treatment plants (STPs).

Misrepresentation and Refunds emerged as another significant theme. In one notable case, the builder was accused of misstating the area of a flat, leading to a dispute over the buyer’s entitlement to a refund. The builder's claim that amounts paid were non-refundable was …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review