| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the real estate market, buyers often seek not just attractive properties but also reliable builders. One such entity is the Rajdhani Vihar Residents Welfare Society (RWRWS), based in Chhattisgarh. This blog post delves into the builder's performance in legal cases, providing insights that prospective homeowners can benefit from.
Overview of Legal Performance
The Rajdhani Vihar Residents Welfare Society has encountered a total of three complaints but has a perfect record of winning all three cases. This 100% success rate is notable in a sector often fraught with disputes and complaints. Understanding the nature of these cases can shed light on the strengths and weaknesses of this builder.
Summary of Legal Cases
Cases Won:
- Case One: The appellant claimed non-compliance with orders regarding a swimming pool site, to which the builder asserted completion of works as per the brochure. The Authority ultimately rejected the applicant's application.
- Case Two …
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily revolve around two themes: 'Non-compliance with Regulatory Orders' and 'Disputes over Project Facilities and Amenities.' The first theme includes instances where complaints were made against the builder for allegedly failing to comply with orders passed by the Authority. Conversely, the builder asserted that it had completed all requisite works as per the project brochure, showcasing a pattern of disputes over compliance perceptions.
The second theme spotlights disputes where applicants claimed that the builder did not provide certain amenities and facilities as outlined in project brochures. In these cases, the builder defended its position by asserting that all promised facilities were delivered, even arguing that applicant dissatisfaction stemmed from project progress rather than actual deficiencies in facilities.
The common reasons the builder brought these cases to court include contesting claims around non-compliance, …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!