RAJESWARI INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED logo

RAJESWARI INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Tamil Nadu
CINL72300TN1993PLC024868
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressPlot No. 248, Door No. 18/23, 2nd Cross Street, East CIT Nagar, (Near CIT Nagar Market), Nandanam Chennai TN 600035 IN
Company StatusPublic

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the ever-evolving landscape of real estate, selecting the right builder is crucial for prospective homeowners. Today, we delve into Rajeswari Infrastructure Limited, a builder operating predominantly in Tamil Nadu. With limited complaints and insights into their legal performance, it is essential to understand what potential buyers can expect.

Complaints Overview

Rajeswari Infrastructure Limited has recorded one significant complaint against them. Notably, they have lost this case, raising important considerations for any future dealings with the builder. The nature of complaints often reflects broader patterns in customer satisfaction and operational efficiency.

Legal Case Insights

In the sole case documented, the complainant asserted that Rajeswari Infrastructure did not complete construction within the stipulated timeframe. They sought possession of their flat and damages for the delay. In their defense, the builder attributed the delay to external factors such as the non-availability of raw materials and government approvals. They …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Disputes over Project Delays and Damages Defenses based on External Factors

Analysis of the cases filed against Rajeswari Infrastructure Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolve around three common topics: delayed possession claims, disputes over project delays and damages, and defenses based on external factors.

The majority of the cases involve delayed possession claims, where buyers sought timely possession of their flats and often additional damages for the delay. For instance, in one significant case, the complainant claimed that the builder had failed to complete construction within the agreed timeframe, resulting in a loss for the builder after the authority directed them to rectify deficiencies and pay interest on the delay.

Many disputes also center around project delays attributed to various factors. Buyers commonly contested not only the delays themselves but also the builder's defenses, which often cited external reasons such as non-availability of raw materials and government approvals. The builder's claim …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review