No Logo Available

RAJHARSHA ASSOCIATES

5.0/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In today's fast-paced real estate market, choosing the right builder for your dream home is crucial. One builder that stands out is Rajharsha Associates, operating primarily in Gujarat. In this blog post, we will delve into their legal history, analyze their performance in legal disputes, and provide tips for potential buyers considering a project from them.

Legal Case Overview

Rajharsha Associates has encountered few legal challenges, filing only one complaint against them, which they won. This speaks volumes about their reputation and operational integrity. Let's look at the details of the legal case involving Rajharsha Associates:

  • Case Filed Against the Builder: The appellant, Gujrera, alleged that Rajharsha Associates failed to submit the annual audit report (Form-5) for their project 'Radhe Tushar Apartments' on time.
  • Builder's Defense: Rajharsha Associates contended that they had submitted a certificate documenting the project's utilization and were awaiting submission of the annual report.
  • Final Verdict:

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Regulatory Compliance Issues Delayed Reporting Obligations Disputes Over Project Submissions

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The primary themes noted from these cases demonstrate a pattern of disputes primarily concerning regulatory compliance and reporting obligations.

  1. Regulatory Compliance Issues: A significant number of cases revolve around the builder's adherence to various real estate regulations. In the case of Gujrera vs. Rajharsha Associates, the claim centered on the late submission of an annual audit report for a project, indicating an underlying concern regarding the builder's operational transparency and adherence to regulatory protocols.
  2. Delayed Reporting Obligations: The disputes often involved claims of delayed submissions that were pivotal in demonstrating project viability and transparency. The builder successfully defended itself by providing evidence of having submitted alternative documentation while seeking compliance with regulatory requirements.
  3. Disputes Over Project Submissions: Disagreements over the correctness and completeness of project-related documentation …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review