RAJKUMAR SHARAF & SONS HUF

CIN	Not Available
Year Established	Not Available
Address	Not Available
Company Status	Not Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the real estate sector, a builder's reputation can significantly influence potential buyers' decisions. One such builder, Rajkumar Sharaf & Sons HUF, based in Gujarat, has garnered attention due to their legal standings and complaint history. This post aims to analyze the builder's track record based on the data provided and offer insights for potential buyers considering investments with them.

Builder Overview

Name: Rajkumar Sharaf & Sons HUF

Location: Gujarat
Number of Complaints: 2
Cases Won: 2
Cases Lost: 0

This builder possesses a unique record of having faced complaints but successfully winning all cases filed against them. Such a record can provide potential buyers with an interesting perspective regarding their operations in the market.

Legal Case Details

Summary of Cases

The two cases that Rajkumar Sharaf & Sons HUF won involved similar claims from the plaintiffs:

Case One and Two Summary: Both plaintiffs claimed that the builder did …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Cases where the builder sued others and won. Includes summaries and key insights.

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics

Delayed Possession Claims Refund of Deposits Non-compliance by Defendants

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Rajkumar Sharaf & Sons HUF, which it won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolve around three common themes: delayed possession claims, refund of deposits, and non-compliance by defendants. Most cases centered on the builder's failure to deliver possession of flats on time and disputes regarding the return of amounts paid by the plaintiffs. In each instance, the plaintiffs contended that the defendants did not meet their contractual obligations, leading to legal action to recover their sums.

The builder commonly brought these cases to court mainly to contest claims regarding failure to hand over properties and the corresponding refund requests. This indicates a pattern where the builder faced accusations regarding project timelines and financial exchanges, often leading to litigation due to alleged delays or refusal to return paid amounts.