| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the bustling real estate market of Gujarat, RAJSHAKTI BUILDERS has emerged as a notable name. However, potential buyers need to approach their offerings with caution due to the company's legal complications. In this article, we analyze the builder's legal history, implications for potential homeowners, and important tips for making wise purchasing decisions.
Legal Overview of RAJSHAKTI BUILDERS
RAJSHAKTI BUILDERS has encountered a total of five complaints, resulting in unfavorable outcomes. As of the latest data, the company has lost all five cases filed against it. Each of these cases revolved around claims of construction defects, where the complainants sought relief from the builder. In response, the builder consistently argued that the complaints were barred by the time limit. However, the RERA (Real Estate Regulatory Authority) authority ruled in favor of the complainants, allowing their complaints to proceed.
Patterns in Cases Lost
- Common Complaints: All cases filed against …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Rajshakti Builders, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes associated with their projects.
The cases primarily revolved around two key themes: Construction Defects Claims and Time Limit Bar Claims. The vast majority of the complaints were tied to allegations of construction defects, with multiple complainants seeking relief against the promoter due to perceived flaws in the building's construction. These cases highlight an ongoing concern among buyers regarding the quality of workmanship and materials used by the builder, leading to potential hazards and discomforts post-occupation.
The second recurring theme was the builder's defense based on Time Limit Bar Claims. In each case, the promoter contested the complaints by claiming they were barred by the applicable time limit, arguing that the complainants had failed to raise their concerns within the stipulated timeframe. This defense reflects a …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!