| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the bustling real estate market of Tamil Nadu, Rakindo Kovai Township Private Limited stands out as a notable player. With a singular complaint registered against them, this builder has managed to emerge on the winning side in legal contexts. This blog post delves deep into the legal landscape surrounding Rakindo Kovai Township Private Limited and provides potential buyers with a clear understanding of what to expect when dealing with this builder.
Overview of Legal Cases
When analyzing Rakindo Kovai's legal escapades, we observe the following critical details:
- Number of Complaints: 1
- Cases Won: 1
- Cases Lost: 0
Legal Case Details
The single case filed against Rakindo Kovai was brought by a complainant claiming defects in the design and construction of the residential house. However, the builder countered that their project had been completed prior to the implementation of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA), thus asserting …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Rakindo Kovai Township Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The disputes primarily fall under a few common themes: Design and Construction Defects, Jurisdictional Concerns, and Regulatory Compliance.
- Design and Construction Defects: In the cases examined, claims were made regarding alleged defects in the design and construction of residential houses.
- Jurisdictional Concerns: A recurring theme in the cases was the builder's argument that certain projects were completed before RERA (Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act) came into force, thus falling outside the jurisdiction of the regulatory body. This aspect highlights the importance of understanding the regulatory timelines in the real estate industry.
- Regulatory Compliance: Some disputes stemmed from allegations of non-compliance with building regulations or standards. Buyers claimed that the builder did not adhere to the required protocols, leading to further legal proceedings.
The reasons …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!