| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When it comes to real estate investments, the reputation of a builder can significantly impact a buyer's decision. Today, we focus on Ramesh Paper Mart, a builder with a presence in Haryana. While every builder has its share of complaints, Ramesh Paper Mart's case history showcases an impressive track record of wins in legal disputes.
Overview of Legal Challenges
Ramesh Paper Mart has faced a total of three complaints, all of which resulted in victories for the builder. Each case concerned a common issue: clients sought refunds for booked apartments due to significant delays in possession. The builder's defense typically involved claims that the clients had defaulted on payments while citing financial difficulties faced by the project. In every instance, the authority ruled in favor of the buyers, allowing refunds with interest.
Patterns in Legal Cases
Cases Won
- Common Claims: All three cases filed by buyers were focused on …
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder Ramesh Paper Mart, which it won, revealed the following information.
The builder frequently faced disputes related to delayed possession claims, where complainants sought refunds for booked apartments due to inordinate delays.
In these cases, the defense from Ramesh Paper Mart often involved claims that the complainants had defaulted on payments, and that the construction projects were facing unexpected financial difficulties.
This suggests a recurring theme where delays were attributed to external factors beyond the builder's control.
Essentially, the builder's cases centered primarily around the financial difficulties faced during project execution and the repercussions of delayed possession requests from buyers who may have failed to meet their payment obligations.
A common reason for these legal battles was to contest refund requests based on claims of undue delays, which the builder was able to challenge by highlighting the alleged defaults made by the …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!