RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS Private Limited has been a key player in the real estate sector, particularly in Haryana and Uttar Pradesh. However, with a troubling record of legal complaints, it raises important questions for potential buyers. This blog analyzes the builder's legal history to provide a clearer picture of their operational integrity and buyer relations.

Legal Standing of RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS

1. Complaints and Legal Outcomes
   • Number of Complaints: 93
   • Cases Won: 9
   • Cases Lost: 84

These figures indicate a significant prevalence of disputes against RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS, with a notable majority of their cases ending in losses. This ratio highlights potential concerns buyers should be aware of when considering engagements with this builder.

Patterns in Lost Cases

Upon reviewing the cases that the builder has lost, several common factors emerge:

1. Non-Compliance: A substantial portion of the cases resulted from the builder's failure to execute Builder …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS Private Limited, which it lost, reveals several key themes that have emerged from the disputes encountered in court. These cases primarily revolve around topics such as Refund Claims, Non-compliance with Legal Provisions, Failure to Follow Court Directions, Deposit and Payment Issues, and Regulatory Non-compliance.

Firstly, discussing Refund Claims, multiple cases highlight the builder’s contention that complainants had not paid the remaining amounts or failed to execute the Builder Buyer Agreement. However, the respondents consistently proved their claims of full payment and lack of agreement execution from the builder. As a result, the builder was directed to refund considerable amounts along with interest, indicating a recurring pattern of disputes over financial transactions.

In the realm of Non-compliance with Legal Provisions, the builder repeatedly asserted compliance with the provisions of specific acts, such as proviso to Section 43(5) …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolved around three common themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Regulatory Authority Disputes, and Agent Responsibility Claims.

In the context of Delayed Possession Claims, the builder faced complaints regarding the timely handover of apartments, most notably concerning delays that extended beyond stipulated dates. The builder often established that such delays were due to unforeseen circumstances beyond their control, demonstrating their commitment to transparency and accountability.

The Regulatory Authority Disputes often entailed challenges against orders that the builder deemed arbitrary or unfounded. This theme included cases where the builder contested claims of financial liability associated with the actions of alleged agents, arguing that they should not be held accountable for their acts. Here, the builder succeeded in setting aside unfavorable rulings, highlighting …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed several important themes. The disputes predominantly fell into four categories:

1. Delayed Possession Claims: Many complaints centered around the builder's failure to adhere to agreed timelines for providing possession of plots, specifically referencing the terms set in settlement agreements. Buyers expected possession by June 2022, while disputes arose when this expectation was not met.
2. Settlement Agreement Compliance: Several cases highlighted disagreements over whether the builder complied with the terms of settlement agreements. Complainants claimed breaches, while the builder maintained they had fulfilled their obligations and settled all disputes adequately according to these agreements.
3. Withdrawal of Complaints: In some instances, complaints were withdrawn entirely, suggesting that claimants chose not to pursue their cases further, potentially due to reassessment of their claims or settlements outside of court.
4. Non-maintainability of Cases: …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis