| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the ever-evolving world of real estate, choosing a trustworthy builder can significantly affect your investment and peace of mind. RAMPRASTHA PROMOTORS AND DEVELOPERS Private Limited, based in Haryana, presents an intriguing case study. This blog delves into the builder's complaint history, legal outcomes, and essential insights for potential buyers.
Overview of Legal Cases
RAMPRASTHA PROMOTORS AND DEVELOPERS has faced a total of three complaints. Out of these, they lost two cases and won one, indicating a mixed performance in legal disputes.
Cases Won vs. Cases Lost
- Cases Lost (2 cases):
- Both cases that the builder lost were determined to be non-maintainable due to existing parallel proceedings in the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC). This suggests possible procedural issues rather than the merits of the claims themselves. The unspecified nature of the appellant and respondent claims leaves us without clarity on the specifics, but the parallel proceedings …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Ramprastha Promoters and Developers Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key insights into the nature of the disputes faced by the builder.
The primary theme observed in these cases is centered around "Rectification Claims." This highlights an important aspect of the builder's experience with litigation, indicating that many of the disputes revolved around the builder's attempts to rectify or amend previous orders or decisions, rather than outright claims of delay or non-compliance.
People commonly brought cases to court in this context primarily to contest the builder's applications for rectification. The summaries suggest a pattern where the builder attempted to revisit earlier rulings, potentially indicating dissatisfaction with the outcomes or a need to clarify ambiguities. However, the specific reasons for these rectification claims vary, and without more detailed information, it is challenging to pinpoint common triggers for the builder's litigation efforts.
…Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, RAMPRASTHA PROMOTORS AND DEVELOPERS Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes generally centered around legal technicalities that rendered the cases non-maintainable. Specifically, the parallel proceedings in the NCDRC were a common theme among the complaints. In these instances, it appears that either the appellants (i.e., those filing the complaints) had not sufficiently grounded their claims in relevant legal frameworks, or they had initiated concurrent actions that inhibited the court's ability to proceed without conflict.
The complaints did not delve into specific claims, but they likely involved issues such as contested project delays, regulatory non-compliance, or penalties associated with contractual obligations. However, the recurring theme of parallel proceedings indicates that there may have been efforts to pursue multiple legal avenues for the same grievance, complicating the case against the builder.
One common reason for the builder's …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!