No Logo Available

RANGOLI GREENS RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION

5.0/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Rajasthan
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, the reputation and performance of builders can significantly influence a buyer's decision. The Rangoli Greens Residents Welfare Association, operating out of Rajasthan, provides an intriguing case study in builder accountability and customer relations. This blog post delves into the builder's history with complaints and legal cases, shedding light on the implications for potential buyers.

Overview of Complaints and Legal Cases

The Rangoli Greens Residents Welfare Association has received a total of 1 complaint, which ultimately resulted in the case being withdrawn by the complainant. This leads to an interesting scenario where the builder has successfully maintained a clean legal record with no cases lost in the conventional sense of a dispute verdict against them. The nature of the complaint—withdrawal by the complainant—suggests that there may not have been any wrongful action on the part of the builder that warranted further legal action.

Breakdown …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Withdrawal of Complaint Claims Dismissed Insufficient Evidence

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Rangoli Greens Residents Welfare Association, which the builder won, revealed the following information:

The primary theme observed in these cases is the withdrawal of complaints by the appellants. In the sole case summarized, the complainant expressed an intention to withdraw their complaint altogether. This indicates that disputes may often arise from misunderstandings or changing circumstances, rather than an inherent issue with the builder's conduct.

The reported reason for bringing the case to court was the complainant's motion to withdraw their claims, pointing to a potential lack of supporting evidence or conviction in their original stance. This implies that buyers may sometimes act on impulse or secondary information, leading to hasty decisions regarding legal action.

In this instance, the builder successfully defended against any claims primarily because the opposing party chose not to pursue the matter further. Such outcomes suggest that when …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review