
CIN | U45400UP2010PTC042781 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | 113/70, SWAROOP NAGAR, KANPUR UP 208002 IN |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the real estate sector, choosing the right builder can make a significant difference in your home-buying experience. In this blog post, we will analyze Ratan Buildtech Private Limited, a builder based in Uttar Pradesh, examining their legal track record and what potential buyers need to consider when contemplating a purchase from them.
Builder Overview
Name: Ratan Buildtech Private Limited
State with Projects: Uttar Pradesh
Number of Complaints: 2
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 2
Legal Case Analysis
Ratan Buildtech Private Limited has a concerning legal history, having lost all the cases filed against them. Both cases revolve around procedural delays where the appellant cited that they had sought legal advice, which resulted in unintentional delays. However, the respondent argued that the builder failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for these delays, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. This dismissal underscores a lack of compelling justification from Ratan Buildtech …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by Ratan Buildtech Private Limited, which it lost, reveals insightful patterns regarding their litigation approach. The prevalent themes across these cases fall into three main categories: Claims of Unintentional Delay, Insufficient Cause for Delay, and Legal Consultation Delays.
Firstly, the Claims of Unintentional Delay highlight the builder's tendency to attribute project delays to factors they consider beyond their control, like seeking legal advice. However, this approach does not seem to resonate well with the judicial system, as demonstrated by the consistent rejections of their claims. The secondary theme, Insufficient Cause for Delay, reflects a recurring pattern where the builder's justifications for delays were deemed inadequate.
The builders frequently contested decisions perhaps arising from penalties attributed to these delays or shifts in responsibility for reported project setbacks. They appear to struggle to assert convincing reasons in light of regulatory expectations, often falling short when it …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!