CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the realm of real estate, choosing the right builder can significantly impact your investment and overall satisfaction with your home. Today, we delve into the profile of Ratnasagar Heights, a developer operating in Gujarat, assessing their legal track record and offering insights for potential buyers.
Builder Profile: Ratnasagar Heights
- Name: Ratnasagar Heights
- States with Projects: Gujarat
- Number of Complaints: 1
- Cases Won: 1
- Cases Lost: 0
Legal Case Analysis
Ratnasagar Heights has had one notable legal case:- Case Overview:
- Filed Against: The builder was accused of exerting illegal pressure on land by incorporating it into the project without the consent of the land owner.
- Builder's Defense: The builder contended that the claimant was not an allottee of the project and lacked any vested interest in it.
- Verdit: The RERA authority ruled in favor of the builder, dismissing the plaintiff's complaint as the latter had no allotment rights nor …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder Ratnasagar Heights, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily centered around three recurring themes: disputes over land inclusion, lack of allottee standing, and unfounded claims by opponents.
The first theme, disputes over land inclusion, involves cases where individuals alleged that their land was included in the builder's project without proper consent. In the case summarized, the opposing party claimed illegal pressure applied by the developer. However, the builder effectively argued that the complainant was not an allottee and thus had no stake in the project.
The second theme, lack of allottee standing, further emphasizes the necessity for complainants to establish a legitimate claim to the project in question. In these cases, the builder demonstrated that the plaintiffs did not meet the criteria to be classified as allotters, leading to the dismissal of the complaints.
…
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!