| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the realm of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for ensuring a smooth home-buying experience and a secure investment. RAVI DEVELOPERS, which operates primarily in Maharashtra, has faced scrutiny due to its legal performance, specifically concerning a couple of complaints lodged against the company. This article aims to provide insight into RAVI DEVELOPERS based on available data regarding their legal history and outcomes.
Overview of RAVI DEVELOPERS
RAVI DEVELOPERS has garnered attention due to having received two complaints, both of which they lost, leading to an unfavorable standing in the eyes of potential buyers. With no cases won, the performance record raises questions about their reliability and customer satisfaction.
Legal Case Details
Two cases were filed against RAVI DEVELOPERS:
- Case 1 Summary:
- Appellant Claim: The applicant contested the sustainability of the registrar's order, seeking to have it nullified.
- Respondent Claim: The builder opposed the miscellaneous application.
- …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Ravi Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into regulatory compliance disputes and procedural fairness claims.
The first type of dispute revolves around the builder's adherence to regulatory requirements. In these cases, the builder often contested the registrar's orders or sought to overturn penalties imposed for alleged non-compliance. The common thread among these disputes is the builder's challenge to the authority's interpretation of regulatory standards and their application to specific projects. Individuals bringing these cases to court typically did so to contest what they perceived as unfair penalties or to dispute delays attributed to other parties involved in the project.
The second theme involves claims of procedural unfairness. Here, the builder questioned the legitimacy of the decision-making process, arguing that orders were issued without sufficient cause or that their appeals were not adequately …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!