| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the realm of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for ensuring a smooth home-buying experience and a secure investment. RAVI DEVELOPERS, which operates primarily in Maharashtra, has faced scrutiny due to its legal performance, specifically concerning a couple of complaints lodged against the company. This article aims to provide insight into RAVI DEVELOPERS based on available data regarding their legal history and outcomes.
Overview of RAVI DEVELOPERS
RAVI DEVELOPERS has garnered attention due to having received two complaints, both of which they lost, leading to an unfavorable standing in the eyes of potential buyers. With no cases won, the performance record raises questions about their reliability and customer satisfaction.
Legal Case Details
Two cases were filed against RAVI DEVELOPERS:
- Case 1 Summary:
- Appellant Claim: The applicant contested the sustainability of the registrar's order, seeking to have it nullified.
- Respondent Claim: The builder opposed the miscellaneous application.
- Final Verdict: The application was allowed, resulting in the registrar's order being set aside.
- Case 2 Summary:
- Appellant Claim: The initial appellant argued that the impugned order was unjust and sought relief.
- Respondent Claim: The builder's representatives contended that the appellant lacked adequate grounds for the appeal.
- Final Verdict: The appeal was partly allowed; however, the complaints and the appeal were dismissed against the applicants.
Analysis
Patterns in Cases Lost:
RAVI DEVELOPERS has a significant trend of unfavorable outcomes in its legal cases:
- Common Theme: The outcomes indicate a lack of successful defense against the claims made by the appellants. Both instances involved the builder's opposition to claims that were not upheld by the courts.
- Legal Precedents: Each case reflected deficiencies in the builder's position, suggesting they lacked the requisite grounds to substantiate their claims satisfactorily in court.
Patterns in Cases Won:
Interestingly, no cases have been won by RAVI DEVELOPERS, leading to a stark lack of favorable outcomes in their legal history. While the builder has not achieved any victories, it is notable that they attempted reasonable defenses that were ultimately unsuccessful; however, these attempts did not reflect any patterns of successful claims.
Conclusion
Based on the data provided, RAVI DEVELOPERS appears to have a challenging reputation, primarily characterized by unfulfilled legal defenses and a complete absence of successfully contested cases. This trend raises concerns for potential buyers contemplating investment in properties managed by this builder.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Investigate Legal History: Before proceeding with RAVI DEVELOPERS, potential buyers should thoroughly research the builder's legal history and outcomes to gauge potential risks.
- Seek Reviews and Testimonials: Look for reviews from previous buyers for insights regarding their experiences with the builder.
- Consider Alternative Builders: If RAVI DEVELOPERS has shown consistent legal issues, consider exploring options with other builders who have more positive track records.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Check Credentials: Verify licenses and certifications to ensure the builder meets industry standards.
- Review Completed Projects: Inspect prior projects to assess quality and craftsmanship.
- Request References: Ask builders for references from past clients to discuss their experiences in depth.
- Understand Contracts: Make sure to thoroughly review all contracts and legal documents before signing, ensuring clarity on warranties, timelines, and deliverables.
In summary, while RAVI DEVELOPERS has moved beyond two legal cases, their history paints a concerning picture that potential homebuyers should consider seriously.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Ravi Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into regulatory compliance disputes and procedural fairness claims.
The first type of dispute revolves around the builder's adherence to regulatory requirements. In these cases, the builder often contested the registrar's orders or sought to overturn penalties imposed for alleged non-compliance. The common thread among these disputes is the builder's challenge to the authority's interpretation of regulatory standards and their application to specific projects. Individuals bringing these cases to court typically did so to contest what they perceived as unfair penalties or to dispute delays attributed to other parties involved in the project.
The second theme involves claims of procedural unfairness. Here, the builder questioned the legitimacy of the decision-making process, arguing that orders were issued without sufficient cause or that their appeals were not adequately considered. The reasons for lost cases within this theme often center around the builder's failure to provide substantial evidence to support their claims or a lack of compliance with interim directions from regulatory bodies.
A pattern emerges from these summaries: Ravi Developers frequently found itself in litigation due to a combination of factors, including a perceived lack of regulatory compliance and a tendency to challenge procedural decisions made by authorities. The builder’s losses in these cases highlight the importance of understanding and adhering to the complex regulatory landscape in real estate development, as well as the need for robust evidence-based defenses in legal disputes.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATOOS000000053460 | Maharashtra | The appeal was partly allowed, and the impugned o… | ["RERA appeal"] | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Gaurav Aster CHSL | Ravi Developers | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1Aw4OCzxpywdxW7NmwKVSpMEYeKNOTmDG |
| AT006000000134157 | Maharashtra | The applicant's misc. application was allowed as … | ["Misc. Application… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Mr. Hingwala Sufiya… | Ravi Developers | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1ygu81fE6Yvvs7bgoNp47Qsu7ThZVYtdl |