No Logo Available

RAVI DEVELOPMENT

4.5/5 (11 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Maharashtra
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Ravi Development is a builder operating within the state of Maharashtra, and while they have made a mark in the real estate sector, their legal encounters provide insight into their operations. This blog delves into the complaints filed against them, their legal victories and losses, and offers tips for potential buyers navigating the real estate market.

Legal Overview

Ravi Development has faced a total of 11 complaints, out of which they have won 6 cases and lost 5. This gives a win-loss ratio of approximately 1.2:1, indicating that the builder has a generally favorable outcome in legal disputes.

Case Analysis

  1. Cases Won (6 total)
    • Types of Successful Outcomes:
      • 2 cases were resolved through amicable settlements.
      • 5 cases involved the tribunal condoning delays in filing appeals, displaying a trend where procedural aspects tended to favor the builder.
      • Additionally, there were financial settlements in two cases where terms were reached, requiring …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delay Condensation Claims Interest Payment Disputes Case Restoration Claims

Analysis of the cases filed against Ravi Development, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the various disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three main topics: Delay Condensation Claims, Interest Payment Disputes, and Case Restoration Claims.

The majority of the cases involved claims from the applicants seeking condonation of delay in filing their appeals. This suggests that one of the most common reasons people brought cases to court was to seek leniency in the timeline for their appeals, likely due to circumstances that hindered their ability to file on time. The builder's defense in these instances was inadequately presented, or no substantial counter-claims were provided, leading to the tribunal's decision to condone the delays. This pattern indicates a potential systemic issue where the builder may not have had adequate legal representation or perhaps underestimated the validity of the applicants’ claims.

Another significant theme …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Amicable Settlements Withdrawal of Appeals

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Ravi Development, which it won, revealed the following information. There are two notable themes discernible from the summaries, namely 'Amicable Settlements' and 'Withdrawal of Appeals'. These themes reflect common resolution pathways taken in disputes involving this builder.

The first theme, 'Amicable Settlements', indicates that some disputes ended through mutual agreement, allowing both parties to settle their differences outside of a prolonged legal battle. This aspect showcases the builder's willingness to collaborate and negotiate, providing a basis for resolving disputes amicably when possible.

The second theme is 'Withdrawal of Appeals', which highlights cases where the opposing parties, in this instance, the applicants, chose to withdraw their claims unconditionally. This outcome suggests that there may be instances where the claims against Ravi Development lacked sufficient ground, leading to a retraction by the other party.

Commonly, the builder brought these cases to court for …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delay Condonation Appeals Service of Complaints and Appeals Restoration of Appeals and Prosecution Issues

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Ravi Development, which the builder won, revealed the following information. These cases can be grouped into several common themes, shedding light on the primary disputes that arose between the builder and the opposing parties.

  1. Delay Condonation Appeals: Multiple cases involved the challenge against delay condonation orders. Applicants argued that these orders were granted without sufficient cause, which typically points to disputes over project timelines and expectations. However, the builder successfully defended the validity of the condonation by demonstrating that the applicants failed to provide permissible grounds for review under established legal frameworks.
  2. Service of Complaints and Appeals: Another common theme emerged around the service of complaints and appeals where the applicants claimed they were not properly served. In these instances, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the builder, indicating that the complaints and appeals were indeed …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review