No Logo Available

RDB JAIPUR INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

3.8/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Rajasthan
CINU70101WB2005PTC106328
Year EstablishedNot Available
Address8/1 LAL BAZAR STREET 1ST FLOOR , KOLKATA, West Bengal, India - 700001
Company StatusPrivate

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

When considering a property investment, evaluating the reputation and performance of the builder is paramount. RDB Jaipur Infrastructure Private Limited, operating in Rajasthan, presents an interesting case study due to its history of legal disputes relative to customer service and project delivery. This blog post explores the legal record of RDB Jaipur, identifying patterns in their case outcomes and providing insights for potential buyers.

Overview of Legal Cases

RDB Jaipur Infrastructure Private Limited has faced two documented complaints, both resulting in losses for the builder. Below is a summary of the cases:

  1. Case 1
    • Appellant Claim: Delay in possession of the villa and compensation sought.
    • Respondent Claim: Cited various reasons for delays including demonetization, raw material scarcity, and non-payment from some allottees.
    • Final Verdict: The adjudicating officer awarded the complainant 3% annual simple interest, ₹1,00,000 for deficiencies, and ₹20,000 towards litigation costs.
  2. Case 2
    • Appellant Claim

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Deficiency in Service and Compensation Penalties for Project Delays

Analysis of the cases filed against RDB Jaipur Infrastructure Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around delayed possession claims, highlighting significant disputes between the builder and the complainants regarding timely delivery of villas.

One of the most recurring themes is the builder's inability to provide possession of the villas on schedule. Complainants sought compensation for these delays, asserting that the builder failed to meet contractual obligations. The builder, in their defense, cited various reasons for the delays, such as the impact of demonetization, scarcity of raw materials, non-payment by some allottees, implementation of GST, and the outbreak of Covid-19. However, the adjudicating officer did not accept these defenses and ruled in favor of the complainants, indicating a degree of disfavor towards the builder's justifications.

The common triggers for litigation in these cases were the failure to deliver completed villas on …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review