REAL REVOLUTION DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 1
- States (Active in): Rajasthan
| CIN | U45201RJ2008PTC025618 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 3-Jan-08 |
| Address | B-32, MAHESH NAGAR TONK ROAD JAIPUR RJ 302015 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Introduction
Real Revolution Developers Private Limited is a builder that has made its presence felt in Rajasthan's real estate market. While the allure of new properties can be tempting, it's crucial for potential buyers to examine recent legal challenges faced by builders. In this blog, we will analyze the legal performance of Real Revolution Developers, detailing any associated complaints and case outcomes to empower buyers in making informed decisions.
Overview of Complaints and Legal Cases
In the realm of real estate, legal disputes can arise due to various reasons, including miscommunication regarding property specifications, delivery delays, and other compliance issues. For Real Revolution Developers, there has been a total of 1 complaint filed against them. Unfortunately, they have lost that case, highlighting a significant area of concern.
Legal Case DetailsThe details surrounding the single legal case indicate that the builder faced a complaint where the respondent (the builder) claimed that any alleged violation was unintentional. They argued that all necessary details were provided to their advertising agency. However, the judgement from the authority resulted in a penalty of Rs 10,000 against Real Revolution Developers, in addition to a directive to submit a compliance report.
Analysis of Legal Patterns
Cases Lost
From the provided data, it appears that the builder lacks a robust history of maintaining compliance. The single case lost indicates potential issues in adherence to regulatory standards. The penalty imposed could suggest negligence in ensuring that their advertising and project-related information were adequately conveyed to the public and stakeholders.
Cases Won
Interestingly, there are no instances of cases won by Real Revolution Developers. This aspect raises questions about their litigation strategy or their approach to resolving disputes that emerge in the course of their operations. With only one complaint leading to a loss, there is minimal data to infer patterns of success in legal matters.
Conclusion
In conclusion, potential buyers should approach Real Revolution Developers with caution. The existence of a legal complaint and a subsequent loss indicates areas requiring improvement within the company’s operational practices.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Conduct Thorough Research: Before making a purchase, investigate the builder's reputation in detail and assess any legal disputes they may be involved in.
- Request Compliance Reports: Obtain and review any compliance reports filed by the builder to understand their adherence to laws and regulations.
- Engage with Previous Buyers: Speak with previous buyers to gain insight into their experiences and satisfaction with the builder’s services and property quality.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Check Reviews: Look for reviews and feedback from previous clients across multiple platforms to get a comprehensive view of the builder’s performance.
- Verify Licensing and Certifications: Ensure that the builder holds the necessary licenses and has the certifications required for real estate operations in their respective state.
- Evaluate Project Quality: Visit existing projects by the builder to assess the quality of construction and adherence to promised specifications.
By leveraging this information, potential buyers can navigate the complexities of real estate more effectively and make informed decisions regarding their investments.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Real Revolution Developers Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key insights into their legal disputes.
The cases can be broadly categorized into two themes: regulatory non-compliance and penalties for violations. The builder faced penalties due to unintentional violations of regulatory requirements, particularly in relation to their advertising practices. The Authority imposed a penalty of Rs 10,000 on the builder, indicating a systemic issue where promoters may not fully understand or adhere to the regulations governing their marketing efforts.
A common reason for litigation in these cases was the builder’s failure to comply with the regulatory framework, which raised questions about their operational adherence to laws and guidelines. The builder's defense—that the violation was unintentional and attributed to their advertising agency—highlights a pattern where promoters may deflect responsibility rather than acknowledging and rectifying compliance issues.
The conclusion of these cases indicates that the builder lost primarily due to their non-compliance with regulatory requirements. The penalties imposed serve as a warning to the builder to take regulatory obligations seriously and to ensure thorough vetting of any marketing materials produced on their behalf.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F.15(131)/2020 | Rajasthan | The respondent promoter was fined Rs 10,000 for n… | ["Unintentional hum… | {"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "The … | Real Revolution Dev… | https://rera.rajasthan.gov.in/Content/pdf/9534F.15(131)SUO MOTO VS REAL REVOLUTION.pdf |