| CIN | U45200DL2006PLC156234 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | D-22, DEFENCE COLONY, NEW DELHI South Delhi DL 110024 IN |
| Company Status | Public |
Overall Case Outcomes
Overview of Realtech Infrastructure Limited
Realtech Infrastructure Limited is a builder that has faced significant legal challenges, particularly in the state of Haryana. With a history of 27 recorded complaints, the builder has won only 1 case while losing a staggering 26 cases. This alarming statistic raises concerns among potential buyers regarding the builder's reliability and adherence to legal standards.
Legal Case Analysis
Lost Cases Patterns
In the only case that Realtech Infrastructure Limited lost, the builder was found liable for selling licensed land to two companies without adhering to necessary regulations, as identified by the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HRERA). The final verdict indicated that the builder was no longer liable for registration, emphasizing a pivotal issue related to compliance and transparency. This case highlights a significant red flag in the builder's operational integrity and suggests a tendency towards non-compliance with regulations.
Won Cases Patterns
On the contrary, …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Realtech Infrastructure Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into two main topics: illegal charges and delay interest, and withdrawal of complaints.
The majority of the cases centered around the builder's demand for various charges that the complainants deemed illegal, including electrification charges, IFMS (Infrastructure Facility Management System), GST (Goods and Services Tax), sinking fund, and delay interest. The builder consistently claimed that these charges were in accordance with their agreement and that possession had been offered in 2020. However, the authority ruled in favor of the complainants, quashing certain charges and ordering the calculation of delay interest at a rate of 9.30% from the deemed date of possession to the date of offer. This highlights a significant area of contention between the builder's financial demands and the expectations of the buyers, as well …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. These cases mainly revolved around disputes categorized into two significant themes: 'Land Sale Disputes' and 'Regulatory Compliance Issues'. The former includes complaints relating to land transactions, where complaints were made that the builder sold licensed land unlawfully, while the latter focuses on issues surrounding the builder's compliance with applicable regulations and requirements related to land registration.
In the documented case, HRERA alleged that Dove Infrastructure sold licensed land to two companies in violation of regulations. The builder responded by asserting that it was not liable for the registration of the land since it had already completed the sale. The final verdict, which ruled in favor of the builder, emphasized that the builder was no longer responsible for registration and issued notices to the other companies, reinforcing the builder's stance on the …
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!