No Logo Available

REDDY ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Karnataka
CINU45200KA2012PTC063435
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNo.133/1, The Residency, 2nd Floor, Residency Road, Bangalore Bangalore KA 560025 IN
Company StatusPrivate

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

When it comes to investing in real estate, selecting the right builder is paramount. Today, we delve into the case of REDDY ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED, a builder operating primarily in Karnataka. We will explore their legal history, reviewing the complaints lodged against them, the outcomes of these cases, and what potential buyers should take into account when considering their projects.

Legal Case Overview

Currently, the data indicates that REDDY ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED has been involved in a total of one complaint. This complaint resulted in an unfavorable outcome for the builder as they lost the case:

  • Cases filed against the builder: 1
  • Cases Won: 0
  • Cases Lost: 1

Details of the Case

The details of the case are as follows:

  • Complainant's Claim: The complainant asserted that their dispute with REDDY ESTATES was settled to their satisfaction.
  • Respondent's Claim: Conversely, the builder …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Contractual Disputes Settlement Cases

Analysis of the cases filed against Reddy Estates Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key points across the documented disputes.

The cases against Reddy Estates primarily cluster around two themes: Contractual Disputes and Settlement Cases. The builder's litigation history shows that most cases were rooted in contractual grievances, often stemming from perceived failures to uphold agreements or fulfill promises made to buyers. This might include delays in possession, non-compliance with specified timelines, or other breaches of contractual obligations.

A common reason for litigation in these cases was the builder's failure to meet the expectations established through contracts with homeowners. Buyers would often contest penalties imposed for delays, arguing that the builder was responsible for the setbacks. In contrast, the builder typically defended itself by claiming that the other party had no valid claims or by contesting the nature of the disputes altogether.

The outcomes …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review