REDDY STRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

Purchasing a property is one of the most significant financial decisions a person can make, and choosing the right builder is crucial for safeguarding that investment. Reddy Structure Private Limited, a builder operating in Karnataka, has garnered attention through a series of legal complaints, which brings to light essential considerations for potential buyers. This blog delves into the builder's legal history, highlighting outcomes, patterns from their cases, and tips for prospective buyers.

Legal Case Overview

Reddy Structure Private Limited has faced a total of 22 complaints, with 21 cases ruled against the builder and only 1 case in their favor. Despite this, the legal landscape presents a mix of issues that potential buyers should consider before engaging with the builder.

Cases Lost by Reddy Structure Private Limited

The majority of the complaints against Reddy Structure Private Limited stem from allegations regarding incomplete projects, particularly in regards to promised amenities …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Reddy Structure Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties involved. The cases primarily revolve around delayed possession claims and the penalties imposed due to project delays. There are also significant concerns regarding the timely completion of pending works, which suggests a pattern of insufficient project management and adherence to timelines.

The reasons for filing these cases typically center around the builder's failure to deliver completed units within the stipulated time frame, which led complainants to seek interest compensation for the delay period. The common trigger for litigation in these instances was the builder’s inability to fulfill project deadlines, resulting in dissatisfaction among buyers who counted on timely possession of their properties.

Notably, the builder's defense was inadequately presented, as indicated by the lack of a filed statement of objections in the highlighted case. …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Reddy Structure Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes largely revolved around project delays and claims of incomplete amenities, primarily related to the Mahaveer Palatium project. In several instances, complainants alleged that promised amenities, such as a Roman-themed club house and other facilities, were not delivered, prompting them to seek relief from regulatory authorities. These issues predominantly fell into the 'Project Delays and Incomplete Amenities' category and showcased a common grievance of buyers expecting timely possession and completion of projects as per their initial agreements.

The complaints were often rooted in claims of non-compliance with regulatory frameworks, where appellants argued that the builder failed to adhere to the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (K-RERA) requirements. However, the defendable point from Reddy Structure was that the projects in question were either not ongoing at the time of …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis