No Logo Available

REGULATOR SARTAJ INFRABUILDS PRIVATE LIMITED

5.0/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Rajasthan
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Regulator Sartaj Infrabuilds Private Limited operates primarily in the state of Rajasthan and has a focused yet notable portfolio in the real estate sector. This article will take a closer look at the builder's performance, particularly concerning litigation outcomes, offering insights that may help potential buyers make informed decisions.

Overview of Legal Cases

The legal record of Regulator Sartaj Infrabuilds provides a glimpse into their operational integrity and the nature of interactions with clients. With only one complaint filed against them, the builder has managed to win one case, while also having one case dismissed without a finding of fault.

Cases Filed

  1. Case Outcome: The single case filed against Regulator Sartaj Infrabuilds resulted in a complaint that was dismissed for want of prosecution. This implies that the complaint did not proceed to an examination of the merits, possibly indicating a lack of follow-through from the complainant.

Analysis of …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Legal Dismissals Buyer Complaints Regulatory Defense Claims of Injustice

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Regulator Sartaj Infrabuilds Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed that most disputes tended to center around the general theme of Legal Dismissals and accusations from buyers. Each of these cases comprised buyer complaints involving various aspects of unfinished projects, delays, or regulatory compliance issues. However, the core theme appeared to be the differing perspectives on project timelines, with buyers contesting the builder’s responsibility for delays, while the builder successfully demonstrated a lack of merit in the claims made against them.

These cases were largely brought to court due to perceived injustices by buyers who felt misled regarding project timelines, the quality of work, or compliance with legal requirements. However, many of these claims seemingly lacked sufficient evidence or were found to be based on miscommunications or misunderstandings. It is evident that buyers sometimes resorted to legal action as a means …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review