CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Revital Realtech Private Limited has made its mark in the real estate sector, particularly within Haryana. However, potential home buyers and investors should be aware of the company's legal history, which raises important questions about reliability and transparency. In this post, we will dive into the builder's legal track record, analyze the complaints, and offer practical tips for prospective buyers.
Legal History Overview
Revital Realtech Private Limited currently has three complaints lodged against it, all of which have resulted in the builder losing the cases. This track record is concerning for potential clients as it indicates a pattern of failure to meet obligations, particularly regarding property handover.
Complaints Breakdown
All three cases brought against Revital Realtech shared a common theme. The complainants claimed that the builder failed to deliver possession of property within the agreed-upon timeframe. In each instance, the complainants sought not only possession of the property but also …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Revital Realtech Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolved around two main topics: delayed possession claims and GST payment disputes.
In terms of delayed possession claims, the majority of the cases stated that the builder failed to hand over possession of the plots within the agreed-upon timeframes. The complainants sought compensation for these delays, asserting that the builder had not only failed to deliver properties on time but also neglected to address the Goods and Services Tax (GST) payments that the complainants were charged. The builder's defense consistently claimed that they had not delayed possession and that the complainants were incorrect regarding the GST payments, stating that they had not received any such payments. However, the verdicts did not favor the builder, as the authority determined that the builder must pay interest on the …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!