REVIVAL INFRATECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED logo

REVIVAL INFRATECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Uttar Pradesh
CINU70102UP2012PTC053956
Year EstablishedNot Available
Address5 A KHAN PLAZA, PRTAP NAGAR RING ROAD LUCKNOW Lucknow UP 226022 IN
Company StatusPrivate

Overall Case Outcomes

Understanding REVIVAL INFRATECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED: A Detailed Assessment

In the competitive landscape of real estate development, the reputation of a builder plays a pivotal role in influencing buyer confidence. Today, we will delve into the case of REVIVAL INFRATECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, a builder based in Uttar Pradesh. We will analyze the builder’s complaint history, legal record, and what potential buyers should consider before making a purchase.

Overview of Complaints and Legal Proceedings

REVIVAL INFRATECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED has one recorded complaint against it. Importantly, the builder has lost this case, indicating some level of dissatisfaction among past clients or stakeholders. Here’s a closer look at the details:

  1. Total Complaints Filed: 1
  2. Cases Won: 0
  3. Cases Lost: 1

The single legal case against the builder concluded unfavorably for them, highlighting that the complaint was taken seriously and not dismissed. The details of the case indicate that the appeal was …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Non-compliance with Municipal Orders Disputes over Land Conversion or Classification Penalties for Project Delays

Analysis of the cases filed against Revival Infratech India Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key pieces of information across the spectrum of disputes encountered by the builder. The cases highlight common issues such as delayed possession claims, non-compliance with municipal orders, disputes over land conversion, and penalties imposed for project delays.

One of the most prevalent reasons for litigation involved penalties for delays attributed to various factors, many of which were reportedly outside the builder's control. However, the common theme among these cases was the builder’s failure to provide sufficient evidence to defend against penalty claims, resulting in legal losses.

Additionally, there were several instances of disputes related to land classification and conversion, wherein the builder's understanding of regulatory requirements seemed to differ from the actual obligations. This mismatch led to accusations of non-compliance with municipal orders, further aggravating the legal challenges faced by …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review