CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
Purchasing a property is one of the most significant decisions an individual can make, and selecting the right builder is essential to a smooth and successful transaction. This article delves into the performance of R.G. Residency Private Limited, a builder operating in Uttar Pradesh, based on their track record and legal history.
Legal Overview
R.G. Residency Private Limited has been involved in two legal cases, both of which resulted in losses for the builder. The central theme surrounding these cases highlights issues related to delays in project completion. In both instances:
- Appellant Claims: The builder cited delays stemming from the pendency of a writ petition before the High Court.
- Respondent Claims: The opposing party asserted that the delays were unreasonable and that the builder failed to provide sufficient justification for these delays.
- Final Verdict: Both appeals were dismissed due to the unreasonable delays and lack of sufficient cause demonstrated …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed by R.G. Residency Private Limited, which it lost, reveals significant insights into the builder's recurring legal challenges. These cases primarily revolve around themes like 'Delayed Possession Claims' and 'Legal Challenges to Writ Petitions'. The common thread among these disputes lies in the builder's attempts to contest imposed penalties and to argue against accusations of unreasonable project delays. A notable theme is their reliance on the pendency of writ petitions as a justification for their delays rather than providing concrete evidence to substantiate their claims.
The builder consistently presented cases that focused on disputing penalties and contesting claims of unreasonable delays, often attributed to external factors. However, a pattern emerges from the summaries: the builder frequently failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for the delays, leading to unfavorable judgments in court. This indicates a fundamental issue in the way delays were documented and justified within …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!