CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Understanding Rhythm Resident Flat Owners Welfare Association: A Case Study
Rhythm Resident Flat Owners Welfare Association (RRFOWA) has earned a notable reputation in the state of Tamil Nadu, having successfully navigated through legal waters concerning complaints from its residents. This article delves into their performance, legal disputes, and essential tips for potential buyers.
Overview of the Builder
Rhythm Resident Flat Owners Welfare Association has encountered two complaints, both of which the builder has won. Notably, the association has maintained a perfect record with zero lost cases, indicative of a strong legal standing in their operations.
Examination of Legal Cases
Summary of Cases Won
The two legal cases filed by residents against Rhythm Resident Flat Owners Welfare Association raised concerns primarily around unfulfilled promises regarding amenities and facilities that were detailed in the project brochure and construction agreement. Here’s a closer look at what transpired:
- Claim by Complainants: Residents alleged …
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Rhythm Resident Flat Owners Welfare Association, which it won, revealed the following information. The disputes mostly involved a series of claims from the complainants regarding the purported failure of the builder to provide various amenities as promised in the brochure and construction agreements. These cases can be categorized into three main themes:
- Lack of Amenities Claims: In these cases, complaints centered around the builder not delivering amenities such as children's play areas, modern gyms, community halls, and other facilities that were advertised prior to purchase. These allegations led the complainants to seek redress through legal channels.
- Disputes Over Payment for Amenities: A recurring theme was the complainants' claims regarding unpaid dues for amenities supposedly included in the construction agreements. The builder contended that the facilities were either completed or that the dues had not been paid …
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!