CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the world of real estate, choosing the right builder can make or break your investment. Today, we take an in-depth look at Riddhi Buildcon, a builder operating exclusively in Gujarat. With limited legal claims against them, it's essential for potential buyers to understand their track record, including successes and setbacks.
Riddhi Buildcon has been the subject of 1 complaint, leading to an unfavorable outcome. The builder lost the case, while no cases have been won in their favor. This brief legal history raises questions about their operational standards and engagement with regulatory requirements.
The sole complaint against Riddhi Buildcon revolved around their project, Yash Plaza. The appellant claimed that the builder failed to submit quarterly reports as mandated by the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) and its associated rules. In their defense, Riddhi Buildcon expressed a lack of awareness regarding the new law and expressed regret for their oversight. However, the authority deemed their explanation insufficient, imposing a penalty of Rs. 50,000 payable by the builder personally.
Riddhi Buildcon's performance in this case provides insight into possible operational shortcomings. The company’s loss stemmed from non-compliance with regulatory requirements, particularly related to quarterly reporting obligations. Such a lapse indicates a potential deficiency in management systems or a lack of awareness about industry regulations.
Notably, Riddhi Buildcon has not won any cases to date. This lack of victories suggests persistent challenges in adhering to contractual and regulatory frameworks, positioning them at risk when facing complaints or legal challenges.
Based on the provided data, Riddhi Buildcon emerges as a builder with a concerning legal history. The single complaint leading to a loss emphasizes potential issues regarding compliance with industry norms, raising red flags for potential buyers.
In summary, while Riddhi Buildcon may present attractive offerings, potential buyers should remain vigilant and cautious, using the outlined tips to safeguard their investments.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Riddhi Buildcon, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around regulatory non-compliance, penalties imposed for project delays, and violations of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) Act and Rules.
The builders faced legal challenges due to their failure to adhere to the regulatory framework established by the RERA Act. In one notable case, Riddhi Buildcon did not submit the required quarterly reports for their project Yash Plaza, which led to a fine of Rs. 50,000. The builder's defense of being unaware of the new law did not stand, as ignorance of the law is not considered a valid defense. This highlights a pattern where builders may not be taking sufficient measures to educate themselves about their legal obligations, leading to avoidable litigation.
Common reasons for bringing cases to court included contesting penalties, disputing project delays attributed to other parties, or disagreements over land classification. However, the summary indicates that the builder’s litigation was primarily triggered by their own non-compliance rather than contentious issues raised by other parties.
The builder lost these cases chiefly due to insufficient evidence and non-compliance with legal requirements. The imposition of fines suggests that the authority found deliberate violations of the RERA Act, which further emphasizes the need for builders to take regulatory compliance seriously. Overall, these cases serve as a warning to builders about the importance of fulfilling their obligations and ensuring transparency in their operations.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Suo-moto complaint … | Gujarat | The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority file… | ["Non-compliance of… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Gujarat Real Estate… | Riddhi Buildcon | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1MW6nVkfQtaTQMOESYdH4vp8-lmlNduYE |