RIDHIRAJ BUILDERS AND PROMOTERS LLP

CIN	Not Available
Year Established	Not Available
Address	166, FIRST FLOOR SLC TOWER AMRAPALI MARG, VAISHALI NAGAR NA JAIPUR Jaipur Rajasthan 302021
Company Status	Not Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, selecting the right builder is crucial for ensuring a smooth buying experience and a satisfactory investment. Today, we explore RIDHIRAJ BUILDERS AND PROMOTERS LLP, a builder with a presence in Rajasthan. With a singular complaint on record and a perfect track record in legal disputes, this builder stands out in a competitive field.

Performance Overview

Legal Records

Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 1
Cases Lost: 0

Legal Case Summary

In the one recorded legal case involving RIDHIRAJ BUILDERS AND PROMOTERS:

Appellant's Claim: The applicant argued that their application was rejected without a fair hearing, emphasizing their right to be heard.
Respondent's Claim: The builder stated that the application was rejected due to significant deficiencies, which the applicant was not given a chance to address.
Final Verdict: The court ruled in favor of the applicant, allowing the case to be reopened …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Cases where the builder sued others and won. Includes summaries and key insights.

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics

Opportunity to Rectify Deficiencies Application Rejections Hearing Rights

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, RIDHIRAJ BUILDERS AND PROMOTERS LLP, which it won, revealed the following insights.

The first theme that emerges from these cases is the common occurrence of disputes surrounding 'Opportunity to Rectify Deficiencies'.

In these instances, the builder contested rejections of applications on the grounds that they were not granted adequate opportunity to address or rectify deficiencies.

Another prominent theme noted is 'Application Rejections', where the builder argued against the validity of rejections based on claims of serious deficiencies without being heard, which signifies procedural concerns in the application process.

Furthermore, the cases also involve disputes related to 'Hearing Rights' where the builder emphasized the procedural mishaps that led to decisions made without proper hearings, underscoring the importance of fair due process in legal proceedings.

Through these summaries, it becomes evident that RIDHIRAJ BUILDERS AND PROMOTERS LLP …