No Logo Available

RISE DUKAN MALIK SANGH

5.0/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Rajasthan
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

An In-Depth Look at Rise Dukan Malik Sangh: Builder Insights and Buyer Tips

In the real estate market, selecting a builder can make a significant difference in your purchasing experience and overall satisfaction with a property. Rise Dukan Malik Sangh, operating in Rajasthan, stands out in its legal performance, with a commendable record of successfully resolving complaints. In this post, we will explore the outcomes of their legal cases, identify trends, and offer insights for prospective buyers.

Legal Case Overview

Rise Dukan Malik Sangh has handled one complaint filed against it. Remarkably, the builder won this case, showcasing an ability to address grievances effectively.

Breakdown of the Legal Case

In this single case:

  • Appellant Claim: The complainant sought directions for the formation of an association of allottees and the transfer of common areas.
  • Respondent Claim: The builder contended that the complainant's association was improperly constituted and that forming an association …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Formation of Allottee Associations Common Area Handover Disputes

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Rise Dukan Malik Sangh, which it won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolve around the formation of allottee associations and the handover of common areas. In these cases, the builder successfully contested claims regarding the legality of the complainant's association and asserted their obligation to comply with the Rajasthan Apartment Ownership Act. This led to court directives mandating the builder to facilitate the proper formation of associations and the transfer of common areas within specified timelines.

The builder's litigation appears to emerge from a proactive stance against claims perceived as unfounded or inaccurately characterized. Common triggers for these disputes include allegations surrounding the complainant's legitimacy as an association and the builder's obligations concerning communal property. The builder evidently aimed to clarify the legal standing of any association formed by allottees and safeguard their rights in property management and ownership.

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review