| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the bustling real estate market of Maharashtra, builders play a crucial role in shaping the landscape and housing options for residents. One such developer making its mark is the Rising City Ghatkopar Association. This article delves into their track record, focusing on legal cases, customer complaints, and overall reputation, providing valuable insights for potential buyers.
Builder Overview
- Name: Rising City Ghatkopar Association
- Number of Complaints: 1
- Cases Won: 1
- Cases Lost: 0
- States with Projects: Maharashtra
The Rising City Ghatkopar Association has a relatively clean slate, having received only a single complaint and successfully resolved it through legal channels. This is indicative of their overall approach to customer satisfaction and legal compliance.
Legal Case Insight
Summary of Legal Battle
Rising City Ghatkopar Association faced one legal case where the appellant claimed that the authority had inadequate responses to their grievances and failed to penalize the promoter for …
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. The builder, Rising City Ghatkopar Association, has predominantly engaged in legal disputes centered around themes of non-compliance with regulatory orders and grievances related to project execution. The cases reveal a pattern of managing disputes with aggrieved parties regarding the handling of complaints and the promoter's compliance with established regulations.
One common reason the builder brought cases to court involved contesting penalties imposed for delays or non-compliance, often disputing the assertion that these delays were attributed to the builder's actions. In many instances, the builder argued that factors outside their control played a significant role in project timelines and that they were complying with the requisite standards set by the authorities.
The summaries indicate that the builder frequently won these cases due to insufficient evidence from the opposing parties. In situations where the complaints were …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!