| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When it comes to selecting a builder for your dream home, careful consideration is essential. One builder that has recently come to attention is Ritzy Enterprises, operational in Punjab. This blog aims to provide a thorough overview of Ritzy Enterprises based on available data, including their legal standing and performance in customer complaints.
Complaint and Legal Case Overview
Ritzy Enterprises has received only one complaint, indicating a relatively low level of customer dissatisfaction compared to some other builders. However, it is crucial to note that the company has lost this case without winning any, which raises consideration points for potential buyers.
Details of the Case
In the solitary case that Ritzy Enterprises lost, the complainant sought a refund due to not receiving crucial documentation, such as:
- Copy of occupancy/completion certificate
- Copy of the sanctioned plan
- Various clearances
The builder, in its defense, argued that the project was completed …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Ritzy Enterprises, which resulted in losses, reveals significant insights into their recurring disputes and the underlying reasons for their litigation.
Firstly, it is essential to group the various kinds of cases the builder filed according to the identified common themes. Many disputes revolved around document delivery issues, particularly the failure to provide essential documents such as occupancy or completion certificates, as well as sanctioned plans and clearances. Other notable disputes included issues regarding the applicability of regulations, with specific emphasis on the timeline of the project’s completion in relation to RERA’s enactment. Moreover, possession claims were frequently raised, as seen in the context where the builder contended that the project was complete and possession was not taken by the complainant.
The reasons for bringing these cases to court commonly included attempts to contest penalties, and disputing project delays that were attributing …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!