| CIN | U45209KA2013PTC068127 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | PENT HOUSE , R.J. MANOR APARTMENTS, # 11/A 80 FEET ROAD, 3RD BLOCK, KORAMANGALA Bangalore Bangalore KA 560034 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
R.J. Rishikaran Projects Private Limited is a builder operating primarily in Karnataka. As with any real estate investment, understanding the reputation and reliability of a builder is paramount. In this blog post, we will delve into the available data concerning R.J. Rishikaran Projects, analyzing the legal journey and performance of the builder in terms of complaints and case outcomes.
Legal Case Overview
R.J. Rishikaran Projects has reportedly faced one legal complaint. Interestingly, the builder has not had any victories in court, with all legal matters culminating in setbacks. The specifics of the complaint highlight issues that potential buyers should consider carefully.
Case Details
- Complaint Summary: The complainant raised concerns regarding delays in project completion and sought a refund for the amounts paid. In contrast, R.J. Rishikaran Projects defended against these claims, attributing the delays to various reasons. In the final ruling, the authority partially allowed the complaint, mandating …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against R.J. Rishikaran Projects Private Limited, which the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into two main topics: Delayed Possession Claims and Penalties for Project Delays.
The cases often revolved around claims made by the complainants regarding significant delays in the project's completion, resulting in requests for refunds based on the amounts paid. The builder, on the other hand, sought to dismiss these complaints by attributing the delays to various external reasons. However, the authority found grounds to allow the complaints in part, emphasizing the need for the builder to return the amounts paid with interest.
A common trigger for litigation in these cases was the builder's failure to meet project timelines and fulfill their commitments to buyers. Buyers were not only expecting timely possession of their properties but were also counting on transparency and clear …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!