No Logo Available

RK ASHOKA PARK HEIGHTS

5.0/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Karnataka
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

When considering a property purchase, it's crucial to evaluate the credibility and track record of the builder involved. RK Ashoka Park Heights, a notable project in Karnataka, provides some interesting insights based on recent legal disputes. In this post, we will delve into the builder's complaint history, the legal outcomes, and what potential buyers should keep in mind.

Legal Case Overview

RK Ashoka Park Heights has encountered a total of 2 complaints in which the builder faced legal scrutiny. Remarkably, the builder won both cases with no losses.

Detailed Case Insights

The two cases can be summarized as follows:

  1. Case Summary: Both cases involved complaints about the non-registration of the project and claims for damages due to delays in completion. The complainants argued in favor of receiving penalties for the alleged non-registration and delays.
    • Builder's Defense: In response, the builder contended that the project was indeed registered …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Non-registration Penalties Claims of Project Completion Delays

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder RK Ashoka Park Heights, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The disputes surfaced primarily around a few key themes. Many complaints related to Delayed Possession Claims where buyers sought penalties for the late delivery of their units. Additionally, there were multiple mentions regarding Non-registration Penalties where plaintiffs accused the builder of not registering the projects, despite the developer's defense indicating compliance with regulations. Lastly, disputes surrounding Claims of Project Completion Delays frequently arose, with developers attributing these delays to contributions from the complainants themselves.

Buyers brought these cases to court primarily contesting penalties, alleging failures in project registration, and asserting that there were unjustified delays in completion timelines. A clear pattern emerges from these summaries: complaints often stemmed from miscommunication or misunderstanding of the processes involved in real estate transactions.

On the other hand, the builder …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review