| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When considering investments in real estate, it's essential to evaluate the builder's track record, particularly in terms of legal disputes and customer satisfaction. In this post, we delve into the details of R.K. Milan Procon LLP, a builder currently operating in Gujarat, examining the legal challenges they have faced and what potential buyers should know.
Overview of R.K. Milan Procon LLP
R.K. Milan Procon LLP has faced a total of four legal complaints. Unfortunately for the builder, they have lost all four cases. This statistic raises important questions regarding their operational practices and compliance with building regulations.
Legal Case Analysis
Cases Lost
All cases against R.K. Milan Procon LLP resulted in unfavorable outcomes, indicating potential weaknesses in their project management or adherence to regulatory requirements. Here are the key takeaways from the cases lost:
- The primary complaint involved allegations of constructing additional floors and flats without the necessary approvals. …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against R.K. Milan Procon LLP, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties. The cases can be broadly categorized into two main topics: non-compliance with approvals and registrations, and disputes that ultimately resolved through compromise and settlement.
The first type of case involves allegations of non-compliance, specifically concerning the construction of additional floors and flats without proper approval and registration. In one significant case, the complainant alleged that the builder had flouted regulatory requirements, but the complaint was dismissed due to the complainant's lack of standing as an aggrieved person under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. This highlights a pattern where cases might not necessarily reflect outright malfeasance by the builder but rather a lack of understanding or adherence to the legal framework by all parties involved.
The second category of cases resolved through …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!