builder logo

RMG DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED

  • No of Complaints: 3
  • States (Active in): Haryana
CIN U70109DL2006PTC150054
Year Established 24-Jun-06
Address Kh. No. 300, Gopi Ram Building, Sultanpur Village New Delhi South Delhi DL 110030 IN
Company Status Private

Introduction

In the realm of property development, the track record of a builder can significantly influence buyers’ decisions. RMG Developers Private Limited, which operates primarily in Haryana, presents an intriguing case study. With a handful of complaints against it and a total loss record in legal disputes, potential buyers might want to evaluate this builder thoroughly. In this blog, we will analyze the legal history of RMG Developers, identify patterns in the complaints against them, and offer insights for prospective buyers.

Legal Case Overview

RMG Developers has faced three complaints filed against them, resulting in a 0% win rate in these cases. The legal scenarios presented primarily revolve around delayed possession of flats, a common grievance among homebuyers in real estate. Here’s a summary of the patterns observed from these cases:

Cases Lost

  • Common Factors: All three cases where the builder was found liable centered on the failure to deliver possession of flats within the agreed timeframe. The complainants sought relief in the form of delay possession charges. Notably, RMG Developers consistently cited external factors leading to the possession delays, such as building plan issues and environmental clearance complications.
  • Outcome: In each scenario, the authority ruled in favor of the complainants, directing RMG Developers to compensate for the delay with interest rates ranging from 9.30% to 10.70% per annum for each month of delay until the actual possession was handed over. This indicates a systemic problem within the builder’s operational processes regarding timely delivery.

Cases Won

Interestingly, RMG Developers did not win any cases, indicating a troubling trend for potential buyers. In previously defended situations, the builder's arguments about external factors affecting their ability to deliver on time failed to resonate sufficiently in court. The authority's consistent ruling against them might suggest a trend where the developer's claims were insufficient to alleviate their legal responsibilities.

Conclusion

Overall, RMG Developers Private Limited’s track record presents concerning insights for potential buyers. The builder has not won any of the complaints filed against them, pointing to significant challenges in meeting contractual obligations, particularly regarding the timely delivery of properties. This should serve as a red flag for potential home buyers.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Thorough Research: Before making a purchase, examine the legal history of the builder. Check online resources, reviews, and any available complaints or legal outcomes.
  2. Demand Transparency: Ask for clear timelines on when possession will be delivered and ensure this is documented in your agreement.
  3. Seek Legal Counsel: It may be beneficial to consult with a legal expert in real estate to review contracts and advise on your rights regarding possession delays.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

  • Verify Credentials: Ensure the builder is registered with relevant real estate authorities and has a good standing.
  • Read Reviews: Look for feedback from previous buyers regarding their experiences with the builder, especially concerning delays and customer service.
  • Inspect Previous Projects: If possible, visit past projects completed by the builder to assess quality and adherence to timelines.

In summary, while RMG Developers Private Limited continues to operate, the lack of successful resolutions in disputes is a fundamental factor that potential buyers should consider when deciding whether to invest in property from this builder.

No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Delayed Possession Claims Penalties for Project Delays
Error

This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.

Case Number State Summary Case Topic Detailed Summary Appellant Name Respondent Name Source
5011 of 2020 Haryana The complainant, Jagdish Sehgal, filed a complain… ["Delay in possessi… {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… Jagdish Sehgal RMG Developers Priv… https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/ODcwMDg=
5013 of 2020 Haryana The complainant, Prem Chand Nagpal, filed a compl… ["Delay in possessi… {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… Prem Chand Nagpal RMG Developers Priv… https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/ODcwMDk=
3961 of 2021 Haryana Complainant sought delay possession charges and o… ["Delay in possessi… {"appellant_claim": "Complainant claimed that res… Sunita Satija RMG Developers Priv… https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTMxNTQx

Interested to buy from this builder?

Assured Callback in 5 mins