No Logo Available

RNA UNIVERSAL

3.8/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Maharashtra
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for a smooth property transaction and a hassle-free living experience. RNA Universal, based primarily in Maharashtra, presents an interesting case study, especially when it comes to its track record with legal complaints. With a modest number of complaints and an unfortunate record of losing all cases, potential buyers may need to exercise caution. This blog post delves into the builder’s legal performances and outlines considerations for prospective homeowners.

Legal Case Details

RNA Universal has faced a total of 2 legal complaints. Notably, the builder has a poor track record regarding these cases, having lost both. The details of the cases highlight significant issues, primarily related to the delivery of possession.

Overview of Lost Cases

The cases filed against RNA Universal involved similar claims from the appellants:

  • Appellants' Claims: The appellants expressed that the developer had committed to …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Disputes over Possession Dates Interest Claims for Non-Compliance with Agreed Timelines

Analysis of the cases filed against RNA Universal, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key takeaways regarding their legal disputes.

The cases against RNA Universal primarily revolve around delayed possession claims, with multiple appellants contesting the builder's failure to adhere to an alleged commitment of delivering possession by October 2014. The builder's defense consistently cited a lack of fixed possession dates in the agreements and attributed delays to various unforeseen circumstances. However, the legal verdicts did not accept this defense and instead directed the builder to pay interest on the delayed possession, starting from November 1st, 2014, until the actual delivery of possession.

A pattern emerges from these summaries: the common trigger for litigation in RNA Universal's cases is the discrepancy between the expected delivery timeline and the actual actually delivery date. The builders faced repeated claims for interest compensation due to these delays, which …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review