No Logo Available

ROBOT COMPONENTS

3.8/5 (28 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Haryana
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the world of real estate, the reputation of a builder is paramount in ensuring peace of mind for potential property buyers. Builder strength is not solely indicated by their construction quality or aesthetic appeal; legal standing is also critical. This blog post delves into the legal challenges faced by Robot Components, a builder operating in Haryana, highlighting a concerning trend in their performance in the legal arena.

Overview of Legal Cases

Robot Components has faced a total of 28 legal complaints against them, none of which they have won. Each of these cases revolved around the primary allegation of charging for excessive super area, leading to a consistent pattern of legal defeat for the builder. The following analysis provides insights into the patterns present across the cases decided against Robot Components.

Patterns Observed in Lost Cases

  1. Common Allegation: The predominant complaint in all 28 cases …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Disputes over Super Area Calculations Claims of Excessive Charges Carpet Area vs Super Area Allegations

Analysis of the cases filed by the builder Robot Components, which it lost, revealed significant insights into the recurring themes of disputes encountered.

Firstly, the primary type of cases revolved around disputes over super area calculations. In nearly all cases, complainants alleged that the builder was charging for an excessive super area, often accompanied by claims that the carpet area was disproportionately small compared to the super area. This suggests a fundamental misunderstandings or conflicts regarding the norms of area calculation in real estate agreements.

The builder often brought these cases to court in an attempt to contest these allegations. Common triggers for litigation included penalties for what the complainants perceived as excessive charges, disputes regarding the accuracy of area calculations, and claims that the builder did not adhere to stipulated agreements. It is evident that the builder faced challenges communicating and justifying their calculations in a way …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review