| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | 1, Modibaug, Commercial Building, CTS No. 2254, Ganeshkhind Road, Shivaji Nagar, Pune - 411016 Pune Pune Maharashtra 411016 |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
Rohan Gruh Nirman LLP has established its presence in the real estate market, particularly in Karnataka. This blog post aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the builder's standing through their legal history, along with tips for potential home buyers considering investments in properties developed by this company.
Legal Overview
Rohan Gruh Nirman LLP currently holds a clean slate in terms of legal disputes, with only one complaint lodged against them. Notably, the builder has won every case they have contested, indicating a strong defense of their practices. In the sole case where they were challenged, the situation revolved around a car parking dispute involving Rohan Akriti Building 1.
Case Details
In this particular case, the complainant raised an issue about parking arrangements. The builder, Rohan Gruh Nirman, provided an alternative parking solution, which ultimately led to the complainant expressing satisfaction with the resolution. This outcome underlines the …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Rohan Gruh Nirman LLP, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The examination of these legal disputes indicates a recurring theme centered around specific claims related to project compliance and customer satisfaction with offered alternatives. In one notable case, the complainant sought relief for an issue regarding car parking in the Rohan Akriti Building 1, which shows that parking arrangements are a common concern among residents in real estate projects.
The primary case in question involved disputes over car parking allocation. This highlights a broader issue as buyers often bring claims to court regarding amenities and compliance with promised facilities. The reason for this specific case was the complainant's dissatisfaction with the original car parking solution, leading them to seek legal recourse. However, the builder offered an alternative parking solution that satisfied the complainant, thereby resolving the dispute amicably.
The …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!