| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the ever-evolving real estate market, the reputation and legal history of a builder can significantly influence a buyer's decision. This post delves into the performance of Rosemary Hospitality Private Limited, examining their legal cases, complaints, and overall standing in the industry.
Legal Landscape of Rosemary Hospitality
Rosemary Hospitality Private Limited has been the subject of 5 complaints with a strikingly positive outcome, having won all 5 cases. Impressively, the builder has not lost any cases to date. Their operational activities are primarily located in Haryana, which is a critical detail for potential buyers in this region.
Break Down of Legal Cases
The details of the cases demonstrate compelling insights:
- Case Against Non-Registration: In one instance, the appellant claimed the builder did not register their project with the necessary authority. However, the case was dismissed due to the respondent not appearing in court. This indicates …
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information.
The disputes primarily revolved around a few recurring themes, including 'Delayed Possession Claims' where complainants alleged that the builder delayed the delivery of commercial units.
Additionally, 'Regulatory Non-compliance' issues were highlighted, particularly in claims concerning the builder's failure to register their projects in accordance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
There were also instances associated with 'Force Majeure Circumstances,' where the builder cited unforeseen events that contributed to project delays, as well as 'Penalties for Delays' concerning the financial liabilities of the builder in the case of late possession delivery.
The builder commonly brought these cases to court to contest penalties for delays that they argued were attributable to factors beyond their control, including payment defaults by clients and force majeure events.
This suggests a pattern where the builder sought to …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!