ROURKELA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY logo

ROURKELA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Odisha
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the world of real estate, builders often face various challenges that can impact their reputation and the trust of potential buyers. The Rourkela Development Authority (RDA) in Odisha is one such builder that has navigated the complexities of legal disputes. This blog post aims to provide an overview of RDA's legal standing, including its complaint history and outcomes of legal cases, along with valuable tips for prospective buyers.

Builder Overview

The Rourkela Development Authority is a prominent builder operating primarily in the state of Odisha. Despite having one recorded complaint against it, the outcome of its legal cases reveals much about its standing and practices. In one documented case, the authority did not secure a favorable outcome.

Legal Case Summary

RDA has encountered legal challenges that culminated in one significant complaint. The complainant, in this case, claimed that RDA failed to execute a deed of sub-lease and refund …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Disputes over Lease Execution and Refunds Alleged Non-Compliance with Payment Terms

Analysis of the cases filed against the Rourkela Development Authority, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily center around two topics: disputes over lease execution and refunds, and alleged non-compliance with payment terms.

In the case of disputes over lease execution and refunds, the complainant often claims that the builder failed to execute a deed of sub-lease as agreed upon, which is critical in formalizing property transactions. Furthermore, there are usually accompanying claims for refunds based on payments made for extra land that was not properly accounted for in the final agreements.

The builder's defense frequently revolves around the alleged non-compliance with payment terms by the complainant. The builder claims that the allotment was cancelled due to late payments, which highlights a significant issue in communication or adherence to agreed payment schedules.

The common reasons people bring cases to court in these scenarios include …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review