CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction to ROYAL ENTERPRISE
ROYAL ENTERPRISE is a builder operating primarily in Gujarat. In this blog post, we will examine the builder's legal standing based on the number of complaints filed against them and the outcomes of those cases. With two legal complaints recorded, both of which resulted in losses for the builder, potential buyers should carefully consider this information before making any purchasing decisions.
Legal Case Analysis
Overview of Complaints
ROYAL ENTERPRISE has a total of 2 complaints lodged against them. A breakdown of these complaints reveals that the builder has lost both cases that were adjudicated:
- Case Lost by Builder: The authority accused the promoter of non-compliance with legal standards.
- Appellant Claim: The promoter asserted that they had adhered to all legal requirements.
- Respondent Claim: The authority contended that the promoter had failed to comply with the law.
- Final Verdict: The promoter was fined …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Royal Enterprise, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight two primary areas of concern: regulatory non-compliance and penalties for violations, particularly in relation to the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
The cases often revolve around the builder's failure to adhere to the provisions set forth in the RERA, which led to legal consequences. This demonstrates a pattern where the common trigger for litigation was the builder’s non-compliance with regulatory requirements. The promoters were fined for violations, indicating a systemic issue with adhering to the rules governing real estate development.
The reasons provided for the losses in these cases were consistently rooted in the builder's inability to meet regulatory standards. The fines imposed suggest that the evidence presented during the proceedings emphasized the promoter's neglect of responsibilities under the RERA.
In summary, the cases against Royal …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder, ROYAL ENTERPRISE, which it lost, reveals significant insights into the challenges faced by the builder in the realm of legal compliance and regulatory disputes.
Common Themes of Disputes
The builder's cases predominantly fall under three key themes:
- Non-compliance with Legal Regulations:
In the highlighted case, ROYAL ENTERPRISE claimed compliance with the applicable laws. However, it faced challenges from regulatory authorities who stated that the builder had not fulfilled necessary legal obligations. - Disputes with Authorities:
The recurring theme here is the builder's disagreements with regulatory authorities. In essence, the builder appears to contest the interpretations or implementations of laws put forth by these bodies, which has led to court cases. - Penalties for Regulatory Violations:
A critical aspect noted in the verdict was the imposition of a fine due to non-compliance. This represents …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!