| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Understanding ROYAL INFRASTRUCTURE
In the ever-evolving real estate landscape, choosing the right builder is crucial for potential homeowners and investors. This post focuses on ROYAL INFRASTRUCTURE, a builder with documented legal challenges, to help prospective buyers make informed decisions.
Overview of ROYAL INFRASTRUCTURE
ROYAL INFRASTRUCTURE operates in the state of Gujarat and has been involved in legal disputes that raise questions about its operational practices. Notably, the builder has received a single recorded complaint, which resulted in a legal case against them.
Legal Case Insights
Summary of the Legal Case
- Type of Case: The builder faced a regulatory challenge concerning the timely submission of quarterly returns.
- Appellant Claim: ROYAL INFRASTRUCTURE argued that they had not willfully violated regulations and attributed the non-submission of returns to a lack of awareness of legal obligations.
- Respondent Claim: The opposition asserted that ROYAL INFRASTRUCTURE had indeed failed to meet the submission deadlines, constituting a breach of regulatory requirements.
- Verdict: The authority ruled against ROYAL INFRASTRUCTURE, imposing a fine of Rs. 50,000 for the violations committed.
Legal Patterns and Analysis
Cases Lost
The case that ROYAL INFRASTRUCTURE lost highlights several key factors:
- Regulatory Compliance: A significant issue leading to legal action was non-compliance with financial regulations, particularly around timely submissions. This suggests weaknesses in the company’s administrative processes or understanding of regulatory requirements.
- Claims of Ignorance: The builder’s argument of ignorance indicates a possible lack of sufficient training or knowledge among its staff regarding the legal environment governing the construction industry.
Cases Won
Interestingly, ROYAL INFRASTRUCTURE has not won any cases, suggesting a pattern where the builder may struggle to defend its practices or comply with established regulations.
Conclusion: Assessing ROYAL INFRASTRUCTURE
Based on the data available, ROYAL INFRASTRUCTURE appears to be a builder in a precarious legal position, with one complaint and no successful defenses against regulatory claims. The lost case demonstrates a need for stronger adherence to compliance and better training in regulatory matters.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Do Your Homework: Before engaging with ROYAL INFRASTRUCTURE, thoroughly research the builder’s reputation and past performance in delivering projects in Gujarat.
- Ask for Documentation: Ensure you verify documentation to prevent issues related to compliance that could affect your investment.
- Consult Past Clients: If possible, speak to individuals who have previously purchased from ROYAL INFRASTRUCTURE to gain insights into their experiences.
- Legal Awareness: Familiarize yourself with your legal rights as a buyer in real estate transactions to better protect your interests.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Research Background: Look for a builder with a solid track record of completed projects and satisfied clients.
- Check Complaints and Resolutions: Investigate any complaints lodged against the builder, as well as how those disputes were resolved.
- Quality Assurance: Ensure the builder adheres to quality standards and building codes in all projects.
- Seek Transparency: Opt for builders who are willing to provide clear information about financial practices and project timelines.
In conclusion, ROYAL INFRASTRUCTURE’s current legal standing may raise concerns for potential buyers. With proactive research and due diligence, investors can safeguard their interests in the real estate market.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others but didn’t win. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder ROYAL INFRASTRUCTURE, which it lost, revealed several key insights into its operational challenges and disputes.
The cases can primarily be grouped into three common themes: Regulatory Non-compliance, Penalties for Regulatory Violations, and Disputes Over Documentation Submission.
- Regulatory Non-compliance: This theme highlights the builder's issues with adhering to various regulations set forth by authorities. Specific cases involve the failure to submit quarterly returns, which is a critical aspect of compliance in the real estate industry. The builder’s claim of ignorance of the law indicates a lack of awareness or understanding of the legal requirements governing their operations.
- Penalties for Regulatory Violations: The builder faced penalties related to their non-compliance actions. For instance, in one case, they were fined Rs. 50,000 for failing to submit returns on time. This theme underscores the financial repercussions that can result from neglecting regulatory responsibilities, which can ultimately impact project finances and timelines.
- Disputes Over Documentation Submission: Many cases appear to revolve around the submission and timely delivery of essential documentation, which is foundational in real estate dealings. The petitions often stemmed from the builder's failure to comply with submission deadlines, leading to disputes with regulatory bodies and subsequent penalties.
Common triggers for the builder's litigation appear to stem from disputes over regulatory compliance, particularly relating to the submission of vital documentation such as quarterly returns. The builder often contested these cases, citing reasons such as unintentional violations and ignorance, which point to a recurring theme of insufficient understanding of regulatory obligations.
Upon reviewing the case outcomes, it becomes apparent that the reasons for the builder’s losses often include insufficient evidence to demonstrate compliance, failure to adhere to the regulatory framework, and misunderstandings regarding the importance of timely submission of documents. This not only resulted in penalties but also tarnished the builder's reputation and credibility in the market.
Overall, these case summaries highlight significant operational deficiencies within ROYAL INFRASTRUCTURE that potential buyers should consider when evaluating the builder's reliability and trustworthiness.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCQR-296/2018 | Gujarat | The case involves a real estate project 'Lupin - … | Non-submission of q… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Royal Infrastructure | Gujarat Real Estate… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1Y27ir4XQU3R75bKXncEUxwJSVsHe4pil |