CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the real estate landscape, choosing the right builder is crucial for ensuring a smooth property purchase experience. Today, we’ll delve into the profile of Royal Infraventures, a builder located in Chhattisgarh. This article provides insights into the builder’s legal history, performance in litigation, and essential tips for prospective buyers.
The 1 case lost by Royal Infraventures highlights a significant issue. The complaint asserted that the builder allegedly violated provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. This violation suggests lapses in following established regulations meant to protect consumer rights and ensure quality in housing projects. With no cases won, it appears this builder has struggled to defend its practices in court, which may be a red flag for potential buyers.
On a more positive note, Royal Infraventures did achieve a favorable outcome in another case where the respondent claimed they had developed the project in compliance with regulations and obtained a work completion certificate. However, the case was concluded with a warning rather than a full vindication. This indicates a tendency for the builder to be on the defensive rather than proactive in their operations.
From the data provided, Royal Infraventures presents a concerning picture for potential buyers. The existence of one lost case combined with a warning reinforces doubts about their adherence to regulatory standards. Despite winning a case related to project completion documentation, the lack of definitive victories in significant matters might signal trouble for future clients who may face similar issues.
When considering Royal Infraventures for your real estate needs, it’s important to weigh the available data carefully. While they have developed projects in Chhattisgarh, their recent legal challenges spotlight potential red flags for future buyers. Diligent research and verification of compliance can help you navigate the often-complex terrain of property purchasing and ensure that you choose a builder who aligns with your expectations and safeguards your investment.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Royal Infraventures, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into regulatory non-compliance and project development disputes.
In terms of regulatory non-compliance, the most notable claim involved the builder's violation of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. This highlights a troubling pattern wherein builders may not adhere to the established regulations governing real estate development, which raises concerns about the compliance status of their projects and the potential risks involved for buyers.
Project development disputes revolved around claims made regarding project completion and the issuance of work completion certificates. In these cases, builders often contend that they have fulfilled their obligations and secured necessary documentation, yet still face challenges that underscore issues in communication or requirements adherence.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting regulatory violations, disputing project completion statuses, and navigating the complexities of real estate legislation. Buyers may feel compelled to act when they perceive non-compliance or delays, leading to a pattern of litigation that serves as a check on builder operations.
The builder’s losses in these cases typically stem from insufficient validation of their compliance status, along with a lack of transparency regarding project development timelines and processes. The warning issued in one case about not repeating violations highlights a systemic issue where builders may not take necessary steps to ensure ongoing regulatory adherence, potentially indicating a greater problem within their operational frameworks.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
55-Ash-2024-0284 | Chhattisgarh | The case was closed by warning the non-applicant … | ["Real Estate Regis… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Chhattisgarh RERA | Royal Infraventures | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_SM-EXP-2024-02184/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_fcaad2ee-8650-4955-ae52-ebf469def7f6.pdf |