No Logo Available

ROYAL JAIN CITY

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Rajasthan
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Real estate investments can be a daunting experience, especially when navigating the complexities of builder reputations and legal matters. In this post, we explore the case of Royal Jain City, a builder operating in Rajasthan, to provide insights into their performance, complaints, and legal standing.

Overview of Royal Jain City

Royal Jain City is a builder based in Rajasthan with a limited record of legal disputes. Notably, there has been one complaint against them, which raises questions about their operational transparency and customer satisfaction.

Legal Case Details

Royal Jain City has faced one legal case, which they lost. Here’s a summary of the case:

  • Appellant Claim: The appellants asserted that the builder failed to submit their Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs) on time, resulting in penalties and additional processing charges.
  • Respondent Claim: In response, Royal Jain City claimed that they had indeed submitted the QPRs on time; however, they argued …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Penalties for Project Delays Disputes over Compliance with Regulatory Requirements

Analysis of the cases filed against Royal Jain City, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two main topics: penalties for project delays and disputes over compliance with regulatory requirements.

The first type of case involves penalties for delays, where the appellants claimed where the builder failed to submit their Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs) on time, resulting in penalties and delay processing charges. This highlights a common reason for litigation, which is the builder's failure to meet regulatory deadlines, leading to contested penalties.

The second theme revolves around disputes over compliance with regulatory requirements. In the case summarized, the builder defended themselves by claiming that their QPRs were submitted on time, but technical issues prevented correct uploading. This indicates another pattern where builders attribute delays or errors to external factors rather than taking responsibility for their compliance obligations.

A …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review