No Logo Available

ROYAL TOWN

3.8/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Madhya Pradesh
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, choosing a builder is one of the most critical decisions a buyer makes. Royal Town, a builder operating in Madhya Pradesh, presents an intriguing case study with its legal history. With two complaints against them and a track record of losing both cases, potential buyers might rightly be apprehensive. This blog post delves into the builder's legal disputes and offers guidance for prospective homebuyers.

Overview of Royal Town

Royal Town has faced two legal complaints, both of which resulted in losses for the builder. The cases centered around claims for compensation due to delays in possession and the accompanying mental and physical distress experienced by the applicants.

Legal Case Analysis

Cases Lost

In both cases that Royal Town lost, the common theme was a delay in possession. The applicants claimed compensation not only for the delayed delivery of their homes but also cited …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Mental Agony and Torture Compensation Balance Payment Disputes Unforeseen Circumstances Defense

Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Royal Town, which it lost, reveals several key themes and key issues in its dealings with clients. The cases primarily revolve around delayed possession claims, with multiple applicants seeking compensation for the late delivery of their homes. These claims often come paired with demands for compensation due to mental and physical torture, indicating a significant emotional and psychological impact on the purchasers.

A common defense presented by Royal Town in these cases is that the delays are attributable to unforeseen circumstances. However, the builder has also consistently mentioned that applicants failed to pay the balance amount owed, which raises a question about whether the delay in possession might also be linked to financing issues from the buyer's side. This indicates a pattern where both parties often point fingers at each other, resulting in a legal standoff.

The verdicts from the adjudicating officer …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review