| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Overview of RPS Infrastructure Private Limited
RPS Infrastructure Private Limited is a notable player in the real estate sector, specifically operating in Haryana. Established for developing infrastructure projects, the builder’s reputation can be interpreted from its legal track record and customer engagement practices. Despite facing three legal complaints, RPS Infrastructure has managed to effectively navigate these challenges, winning all cases presented against them.
Legal Case Analysis
Cases Filed Against the Builder
Analyzing the cases filed against RPS Infrastructure, it is important to note that they have won all three cases, indicating a robust defense and operational transparency. The nature of complaints primarily revolved around the submission of required information.
- Case Summaries:
- Case 1: The respondent provided necessary documentation, leading to the disposal of the case in their favor.
- Case 2: Again, the respondent satisfactorily submitted the needed information, resulting in the case being dismissed.
- Case 3: Although the appellant claimed …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, RPS Infrastructure Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases can be grouped into three primary themes: Compliance with Regulatory Requirements, Submission of Required Information, and Claims of Project Delays. These themes encapsulate the majority of disputes brought against the builder.
The claims made by opposing parties often revolved around allegations of non-compliance with regulations, with many cases centering on arguments regarding the submission of necessary documents and information. It appears that there were disagreements from buyers or regulatory bodies concerning whether RPS Infrastructure had properly submitted required information related to their projects. Such disputes often stemmed from buyers contesting penalties that they believed should have been enforced due to perceived project delays or lapses in the builder's obligations. A common pattern emerged, as several claims highlighted a failure from the appellants to adequately provide evidence …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!